this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2026
75 points (94.1% liked)

askchapo

23253 readers
150 users here now

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I see this moon launch as an exorbitantly wasteful, nationalist project. No money for healthcare and housing, but plenty of money to boldly go where man has gone several many times before.

When I bring this up with liberal friends and family, they give me a sort of incredulous look and talk about how wonderful and scientific and non-political it is. I don't mind being the "you've gone too far left" guy, but you talk to the same people about military spending and they're right on board.

Is someone here able to diagnose my crankiness and explain why this is actually a good use of resources? (Will also accept echo-chamber validation and ways to use this to increase class consciousness, if offered.)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] starkillerfish@hexbear.net 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

yeah but i think theres the risk / benefit analysis. especially with things like going to mars, would the risks really be worth the science? people dying in space is not super inspiring.

[โ€“] 389aaa@hexbear.net 3 points 1 day ago

Surely that risk/benefit calculation ought be left to the ones actually being put at risk, the Astro/Cosmo/Taikonauts in question.

I'm sure there's a number of those who would be absolutely giddy to do a Mars Landing, so long as the risk was low enough to be possible at all.