791
submitted 1 year ago by simple@lemm.ee to c/games@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Syndic@feddit.de 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

While I agree that it's rather sad for developer not hosting their Wiki, I really never had any problem with the old hoster of the Minecraft Wiki. I certainly didn't perceive it as a "crappy provider". It did exactly what it needed to and there weren't any intrusive adds or at least not to my attention. But maybe I'm just really good at ignoring adds myself.

Edit: Or mabye my add blocker did help, hard to tell since I haven't seen the internet without it since years now.

[-] poppy@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

Yeah Bulbapedia is fan-run and does exactly what it needs imo.

[-] Deestan@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Ya, not all are the level of Fandom. The old one for Minecraft was somewhat tolerable without an ad-blocker. I don't really feel it is fair to blame the providers either - even Fandom. They are stepping up to offer something nobody else feels like paying for.

this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2023
791 points (97.7% liked)

Games

32349 readers
834 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS