this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2026
430 points (95.9% liked)
Comic Strips
23114 readers
2121 users here now
Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.
The rules are simple:
- The post can be a single image, an image gallery, or a link to a specific comic hosted on another site (the author's website, for instance).
- The comic must be a complete story.
- If it is an external link, it must be to a specific story, not to the root of the site.
- You may post comics from others or your own.
- If you are posting a comic of your own, a maximum of one per week is allowed (I know, your comics are great, but this rule helps avoid spam).
- The comic can be in any language, but if it's not in English, OP must include an English translation in the post's 'body' field (note: you don't need to select a specific language when posting a comic).
- Politeness.
- AI-generated comics aren't allowed.
- Limit of two posts per person per day.
- Bots aren't allowed.
- Banned users will have their posts removed.
- Adult content is not allowed. This community aims to be fun for people of all ages.
Web of links
- !linuxmemes@lemmy.world: "I use Arch btw"
- !memes@lemmy.world: memes (you don't say!)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
He could just use water from a well nearby, right?
Yeah, I don't get this.
In John, there's a wedding and the planners forgot to bring the booze, so Jesus tells some dudes to fill a bunch of casks with water, and then poof kablamo, they are made into wine via the power of Jesus being irritated.
There's certainly a lot of imagery and focus on the blood of Jesus in the Bible... but the whole transsubstantiation/consubstantiation thing is about ... the reverse of this, wine either transforming into, or metaphorically representing the blood of Christ.
I am... not aware of any part of the Bible nor sect/branch/denomination/church that teaches that Jesus at any point turns his blood into wine.
I don't think that even happens in any of the 'expanded universe' / Gnostic texts.
In summary:
Wine -> Blood? Yes*.
Water -> Wine? Yes.
Blood -> Wine? No.
During the blessing at Mass, the priest says "...this is my blood...", quoting Christ at the Last Supper. when blessing the wine. You are overthinking it. I think the joke is that Jesus's blood is wine.
Some Christians (at least roman-catholic) celebrate communion, consuming 'bread' and wine that has been blessed. According to them the bread and wine literally become body and blood of Christ. That's the joke of the comic :)
Yes but that's backwards of what the comic is representing.
As I said... I don't think any kind of Christian believes that Jesus' blood ever turns into wine.
That doesn't happen anywhere in the text.
So... the joke is... based off of a thing that doesn't happen?
It would be like making a joke based off the idea that Moses can summon floods.
He can't. He's never shown to be able to do that, he's shown to be a water bender who can move water out of the way, but not generate it.
When Jesus categorically says "This is my blood" though
Religion is more than just the book. Catholics literally believe that the wine at mass is literally Jesus' blood. This is a joke about them. Not about the book that their specific flavor of whatever is based on.
The literally believe the blessing of the Eucharist turns the wine into the blood of their nailed god.
Not that the blood of Christ turns into wine.
Hope this helps.
And then that wine is like 25 proof. ergo, his blood is 25 proof.
No catholic is taught this line of thinking.
It's the logical conclusion. If Jesus' blood has alcohol in it, then it's alcoholic.
No where does anyone ever say Jesus'a blood has alcohol in it, except this comic which doesn't follow any religion. This is a misconstrued line of thinking that only you and OP seem to be stuck on.
Many catholic churches will use whatever liquid is available, it does not, and never had to be wine.
I'm not sure what you're saying. No matter what liquid the church uses, transubstantiation turns it into jesus's blood. Right?
When I have had jesus's blood, it had alcohol in it.
So anytime the church does transubstantiation, regardless of liquid it started with, it ends up alcoholic.
A sample size of 1 is no study at all for your hypothesis.
Look, I'm not Catholic or any kind of Christian, but...
Catholics do not believe that Jesus' blood turns into wine.
So... acting like they do... is just trolling, basically.
Its not a joke, because it doesn't stem from a thing that someone actually believes.
It is simply asserting that someone believes a thing they do not... which is trolling.
There are a vast plethora of ludicrous things that varying kinds of Christians believe are literally true, that you could make an actual joke out of.
https://www.usccb.org/eucharist
That is the opposite of this though, like all the other comments are trying to explain.
Eucharist = wine and bread turning into Christ's blood and flesh
Comic = Christ's blood turning into wine
How are so many people getting that backwards? Are you all trolling?
You’ll get no disagreement from me
The wine turns into Jesus's blood when the priest blesses it.
This comic is the complete opposite of that.
I can't believe I'm arguing this..
In the comic, Jesus isn't turning his blood into wine. He's simply tapping the vein.
Jesus' blood is naturally alcoholic. We know this because the transubstantiation turns the wine at mass into Jesus' blood, and THAT blood is alcoholic. The fact that the wine was originally alcoholic is completely unrelated. The priests could transubstantiate water into Jesus' blood, and it'd still be alcoholic.
That's assuming you actually believe in transubstantiation.
There are people who celebrate Eucharist with grape juice and it doesn't turn alcoholic. It's not that transubstantiation makes it alcoholic.
So you're saying that Jesus blood is different based on who is doing it??
Sounds like someone is doing it wrong
It's the blessing that matters, not the contents of the cup. In transubstantiation the outward characteristics don't change.
Then how do you know it worked?
Is your faith so weak that you need proof, Thomas?
Ah. The ol' "don't ask because we have no answers" answer.
So I believe that transubstantiation only works in the middle east, and we just haven't realized.
I don't care what and if you believe but the alcohol in the wine is certainly no proof of transubstantiation. Who would even claim it?
It's not complicated. I'm probably just explaining it poorly.
Some liquid turns into Jesus' blood during mass. After that happens, the liquid contains alcohol. Therefore, Jesus' blood contains alcohol.
You don't. It's religion.