Asklemmy

53875 readers

658 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 7 years ago

MODERATORS

-6

Do you think strict two child policy should be a thing? (literature.cafe)

submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by Karl@literature.cafe to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

53 comments fedilink hide all child comments

With exceptions in cases like when a couple loses a child

Edit: in a scenario where everything is good. No wars, no famine.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] over_clox@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

There's no such thing as rapidly aging, there's exactly one year per year, we don't age any faster nor slower. Declining birth rate, sure, but no such thing as rapidly aging.

[–] TORFdot0@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

Rapidly aging refers to the trend line of average age rapidly increasing over time. Not people rapidly aging.

[–] mr_manager@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

The total population will be rapidly aging; I.e. a larger portion of that population will be over 65