this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2026
459 points (98.7% liked)

Selfhosted

58413 readers
105 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

  7. No low-effort posts. This is subjective and will largely be determined by the community member reports.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] esc@piefed.social 108 points 1 week ago (22 children)

Don't expose jellyfin to the internet is a golden rule.

[–] Damarus@feddit.org 84 points 1 week ago (27 children)

Kinda defeats the purpose of a media server built to be used by multiple people

[–] InnerScientist@lemmy.world 35 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Use a VPN, it's not ideal but it's secure.

[–] faercol@lemmy.blahaj.zone 32 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Somehow difficult to install on a TV though.

[–] ramble81@lemmy.zip 15 points 1 week ago (2 children)

That’s why you do it at your router or gateway and then set a route for the Jellyfin server through the VPN adapter. That way any device on your network will flow through the tunnel to the Jellyfin server including TVs

[–] faercol@lemmy.blahaj.zone 28 points 1 week ago

Which again implies that you have a router that allows you to do so. It's not always the case. For tech enthusiast people that's the case. But not for everyone.

I tried to do the same thing at first, but it was a pain, there were tons of issues.

[–] douglasg14b@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Oh yes, the routers and gateways that most people have that are isp provided that may not actually have open VPN or wireguard support.

Those ones?

Also putting a VPN in someone else's house so that all their Network traffic goes through your gateway is pretty damn extreme.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tiz@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Don’t reverse proxies like pangolin just do the job? Does it have to be VPN in this particular concept? VPN isn’t like immune to vulnerabilities.

[–] radar@programming.dev 15 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Reverse proxy doesn't really get you much security. If there is an application level issue a reverse proxy will not help

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] r00ty@kbin.life 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Reverse proxy will let anyone connect to it. VPN, you can create keys/logins for your intended users only. Having said that, from what I could see, nothing in the security fixes were to do with authentication. I think (just from a cursory look), they could only be exploited, if at all from an authenticated user session.

But personally, something like jellyfin where the number of people I want to be able to access it is very limited, stays behind a VPN. Better to limit your potential attack surface as much as you can.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (26 replies)
[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 50 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (25 children)

That’s never made sense to me; why build an authn frontend instead of just clicking your user if the security is just an illusion anyways. “Use a VPN” is fine for a mainframe, but an active project in 2026 should aspire to be better.

Edit: or make note of that on their several pages with reverse proxy configuration.

Examples dating back over six years https://github.com/jellyfin/jellyfin/issues/5415

[–] AHemlocksLie@lemmy.zip 25 points 1 week ago

I mean I'm sure they'd like to just ship safe code in the first place. But if that's not their expertise and they demonstrate that repeatedly, we gotta take steps ourselves. Secure is obviously best, but I'd rather have insecure Jellyfin behind a VPN than no Jellyfin at all.

[–] IratePirate@feddit.org 15 points 1 week ago

It's not this or that. Security comes in layers. So while I would assume that the Jellyfin developers do their best to secure their application, I acknowledge the fact that bugs do exist and that Jellyfin is developed in and for hobbyist contexts, and thus not scrutinised and pentested for vulnerabilities in the way software meant for professional environments would be. Therefore I'll add an extra layer of security by putting it behind a VPN that only whitelisted clients can access.

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago

there is just too much place in the codebase for vulnerabilities, and also, most projects like this are maintained by volunteers in their free time for free.

I guess if you set up an IP whitelist in the reverse proxy, or a client TLS certificate requirement, it's fine to open it to the internet, but otherwise no.

load more comments (22 replies)
[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Y'all are assuming the security issue is something exploitable without authentication or has something to do with auth.

But it it could be a supply chain issue which a VPN won't protect you from.

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

to be fair, Jellyfin had multiple unauthenticated vulnerabilities in the past so it makes sense to talk about it

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LycaKnight@infosec.pub 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah, i have my 30 docker containers behind Headscale (Tailscale).

[–] pfr@piefed.social 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] antrosapien@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I have been planning to check out Netbird for couple of days. Is it a good alternative for headscale and pangolin?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Lemmchen@feddit.org 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The thing is, if you have non-technical users, you have to set up the VPN connection on the client site yourself, maybe on multiple machines and more than once, if they decide to upgrade or even just reset their devices.

[–] esc@piefed.social 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The problem here - it's not me who requires access to my library, if someone isn't willing or able to do it, I'm sorry but that's just how it is. People should stop infantilize non-technical people, absolute majority of them is capable of navigating our world without much problems and I'm willing to help them if help is asked.

[–] IratePirate@feddit.org 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

This. And for everyone you just can't figure it out on their own, there's RustDesk for remote assistance. It, too, can be self-hosted.

[–] Lemmchen@feddit.org 4 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Or you can not be arrogant towards your friends and family who have probably helped you on lots of occasions and will probably keep being there for you in the future.
Idk man, unconditional sharing feels pretty good, tbh. Making them jump through hoops isn't really my jam. To me this kinda all plays into making a stronger bond with people that are close to me, so maybe we have different reasons for why we are sharing our stuff.

Inb4 "we are not the same" meme

[–] esc@piefed.social 5 points 1 week ago

I'm not arrogant, just don't assume that people are dumb and inept. If they can't or don't want to give a bit of time to setup it, well how can someone be forced to use free service that causes momentarily inconvenience once to use. 😔

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (3 children)

So use a reverse proxy with authentiacation before access to Jellyfin is allowed. I use Caddy forward_auth with Authelia for this. Unless you want to use the apps, this works great.

[–] Lemmchen@feddit.org 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Dors that work for the Andoid and Android TV apps?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] mriormro@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Don’t ever shit in your own house, either.

Just in case they’re watching.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kbobabob@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 week ago (6 children)

So don't use it outside your house? Pass

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)