this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2026
104 points (97.3% liked)

Canada

11810 readers
557 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 Sports

Baseball

Basketball

Curling

Hockey

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

An Angus Reid survey says three-quarters of more than 4,000 respondents are in favour of a ban like the one in Australia, where youth under 16 are prevented from setting up accounts on TikTok, Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, Snapchat and Threads.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NarrativeBear@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (5 children)

Or you know, you can let parents take care of their own kids. Stop telling me how to parent my own kids in my own house!

Also obligatory reminder, consumer home routers have had parental controls for years. You can use these functions to whitelist specific websites for your children, while simultaneously block everything not on said whitelist.

On top of this, this is the most privacy respectful option as it means no third party is snooping on what sites your visiting, no one is collecting analytics, and no personal information is made available to said third parties to be hacked and compromised, ultimately protecting you from any identity theft.

On top of this this "same issue" was why TVs have had parental controls for ages. All a parent would need to do is choose to enable and block certain channels behind a passcode/pin for their children. And somehow this solution has worked without being privacy intrusive.

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 2 points 15 hours ago

Never!

Also, I still can't figure out why when my 8 year old annoys me and I give them the keys to the car to keep them busy why they always get up to so much trouble.

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago

Parents suck at parenting most of the time. That's why there are rules specific to minors in a lot of things.

Although for the most part they are terrible useless rules, like movie and game ratings which pretty much everyone that I know of ignores

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

If parents could make responsible decisions then this would never have been an issue.

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 3 points 14 hours ago (1 children)
[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 1 points 11 hours ago

I was giving a non age verification option.

[–] AnalogHole@lemmy.blahaj.zone -3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Right?? Like why tf should i have to show my id to buy beer and weed??

[–] nik282000@lemmy.ca 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

You, specifically, should have to show your ID to buy groceries.

[–] AnalogHole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 12 hours ago

You'd like that, wouldnt you? Pervert.

[–] No_Maines_Land@lemmy.ca -3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There are a lot of things parents can do on their own, but their mental capacity is limited, and things like this make it easier. Peer pressure exists, this helps level the playing field. It also makes it availible to all parents, regardless of how they get their internet (not always a home router).

I can also always stop my kid from looking at advertisements targeted directly at kids as a parent. But it's a lot fucking easier in Québec where it's banned and I didn't have to deal with cartoons of cereal boxes.

[–] nik282000@lemmy.ca 3 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

There are a lot of things parents can do on their own, but their mental capacity is limited

Don't want to be a parent in the 2000s? Don't be one.

It is 100% up to the parent(s) to supply and restrict access to the internet and internet connected devices. If that is beyond your capabilities as a parent-aged human in 2026 then you fucking dropped the ball. We are the "digital natives", we all grew up with an internet connection, some parents have never known a time without smart phones. A failure to learn about and understand how to use modern technology today is incredible.

[–] No_Maines_Land@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 hours ago

Just because I do these things does not mean it's optimal. My concern is that social media exists as a method for furthering monetary, political, and ideological aims. It was promised as great democratization, but has done little of it.

My friend Solomiia has taught her kid to run to to the shelter when the warning goes off even if mom isn't roght behind. She's made a fun game of it. It's great parenting. It would still be easier for her to parent without Shaheds overhead. But hey, I can pat myself on the back because my kid has less screen time.

[–] Canconda@lemmy.ca -3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Between public wifi's and companies harvesting the data of children; this goes way beyond you or anyone's ability to parent.

The notion that this is a failure of parents is just another lie social media convinced you so they could keep preying upon your children.

edit: USA is a shithole so I'm guessing many of you you don't have 3rd party verification through banks etc (FFS you don't even have free etransfers). But the idea that this would require adults to upload their ID if they didn't want to is false.

[–] nik282000@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Don't trust you kid with public WiFi? Don't give them a device that can use public WiFI. Lock it down or lock it up.

Don't want to put in the effort to supply your kids with a safe device that gives them a filtered experience, well that just sounds like you don't want to be a parent.

Parental apathy is paving the way to a locked down internet.

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago

While I agree mostly, you’re acting like getting their hands on an uncontrolled device is hard. Even a decade ago, an old smart phone could be had for a song. Hell, people throw away phones with cracked screens all the time. Then just hop on a neighbors WiFi and bobs your uncle.

Do I think that means all people should have to verify their age? Absolutely not. But this isn’t necessarily something that can be solved with “just be a parent.”

[–] NarrativeBear@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't see how uploading a picture with my personal information to every website I visit would be a solution to this through. Now what about enthusiasts that want to host a website for a blog (like myself) do I need to start to collect your personal information when you choose to visit my website? What will I be able to do with said information?

Instead a simple solution would be something similar to what libraries and librarians do.

Websites should be classified based on age brackets, genres, and any other useful identifying information similar to how books are classified in libraries.

I would propose that a local government funded initiative be setup that to allows the same equivalent of a librarian to curate the internet into defined whitelists based on these criteria.

From there parent then can choose or not choose to activate these specific whitelists either at the home network level or device level.

All this tech already exists, and for tech-savvy users, this functions basically the same way as a pihole or AdGuard, these can also be completely setup both in your home network and still function while out.