this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2026
771 points (94.8% liked)

Political Memes

11506 readers
1872 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

1) Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

2) No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

3) Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

4) No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

5) No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Even with the addition from your edit, I see very little I need to further contribute here. You have served as a perfect illustration of my point. Thank you.

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That which was to be demonstrated once again.

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

This is starting to feel a little bit groundhog-day, isn't it...

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

Fr, and lemmy is broadly left leaning to

[–] teddypolice@feddit.org -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

As an unconcerned bystander I do wonder what you would have to contribute, as it seems you're mostly trying to hate on users from a few particular instances, without any real substance to it. And it does look like you think you had a real "gotcha!" moment there. Instead you're just looking like someone with an axe to grind taking it out on random folks.

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

And that's fine! My intial point was that their accusation of something being a whattaboutism was incorrect - everything else was in response to their attempt to insert themselves as a directly aggrieved party when the discussion was about a group in general, never about them specifically.

I don't know that it's particularly unconcerned to insert yourself into this too, but as the bar has been repeatedly set at "insulting me, lying about a lack of understanding in (what I can assume was) an attempt to discredit my argument, demonstrating that lie and then immediately attempting to walk it back when confronted about it" I am genuinely grateful for a polite interlude in the conversation.

[–] teddypolice@feddit.org 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And that’s fine!

It's fine that you're looking like someone who is out to harass others?

I asked for the contribution you would have made, according to yourself. What was the contribution?

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It's fine for you to have that interpretation, I mean.

And I'm sorry, I'm not sure I understand. What contribution are you demanding of me?

[–] Diva@lemmy.ml -3 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

There's a delightful irony in you attempting to bait this further using a meme depicting something that never actually happened in the anime. Well done, you've made a game attempt, better luck next time, etc. etc.

[–] Diva@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

depicting something that never actually happened in the anime.

It's a great depiction of what you've been up to right now though

similarly dismissively pompus statements

wow it's just like all your other comments!

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

You really want this to become a fight on personal terms, and I'm just not here for that. Resorting to image macro trolling in an attempt to bait out a personal attack so you do not have to address the arguments themselves is a really poor look for your case.

[–] Diva@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

You were the one who didn't actually address anything and are just like "it is proven, my job here is done"

What exactly is the point you feel that you've made?

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

My points stand quite well on their own, and my previous comments quite eloquently address that question. If you are uncertain, I invite you to go and review them. I still feel there is no need to contribute further to what is a well-settled topic.

[–] Diva@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I went back and couldn't find anything eloquent with your name attached to it, just a pile of smug bullshit as usual

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And now we're back to you attempting to draw me into a personal fight.

[–] Diva@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You've been condescending to me from the start. don't start acting offended when you get attitude back.

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There is nothing here that offends me.

[–] Diva@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

there's also no points that you've made lmao

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And you're free to believe that if you need it.

[–] Diva@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm just going off what you've said (or failed to). When I asked for clarification you just acted smug in response.

The extent of our exchange was you saying 'I bet you believe something I think is wrong' and me saying 'yeah I still do because of abundant evidence' and your response was 'QED' That's not making a point, it's just being a pidgeon shitting on the chessboard

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You're still attempting to shift the narrative to my arguments having been interpersonal - which they never were, and will continue to not be. The only claim to your personal beliefs I have made were ones that you yourself had clearly expressed.

[–] Diva@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Your 'argument' was 'I bet you believe something I think is wrong', with no elaboration. you didn't feel the need to address my point about them both being capitalist states that don't represent workers interests.

Calling that 'eloquent' was laughable too

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Your ‘argument’ was ‘I bet you believe something I think is wrong’,

And while you yourself may not be an example of that [...] that’s not relevant to the above generalization.

[–] Diva@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You said that ml and hexbear are far more pro-russian than other spaces; thats a half truth because it's almost entirely a critical support due to its positioning against the US. There's lots of spaces out there that are uncritically pro russian and I have problems with those the same as I would with maga reactionay spaces.

Compared to lib echo chambers like on the the rest of lemmy/piefed it may seem 'far more' in support of russia, but it's really not, especially compared to places with actual chuds running around.

I responded to your bit about what you think I believe and you just responded 'QED', as if anything other than full lockstep repetition of western narratives is evidence of secretly being 'pro-russia'

When are you gonna post this on meanwhileongrad? need more slop content

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I am glad you decided to take my suggestion to review my comments, although I'm not particularly interested in continuing this discussion. It seems unlikely you will be able to reconcile this comment with your repeated (and now clearly understood to be baseless) accusations that I did not have a point, or that the extent of our interaction was "I bet you believe something I did wrong".

[–] Diva@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

You really didn't have a point though, it was just a baseless assertion about instances being 'pro russia' that you refused to elaborate on. That was why I posted the tuxedo mask meme.

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Diva@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

If that's what you need to believe in order to cope, you're free to do that. Again.