this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2026
24 points (96.2% liked)

Climate

8474 readers
248 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Senator Chuck Schumer of New York, the minority leader, said Democrats would pursue an agenda to reduce energy costs if they win back control of Congress.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SGforce@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Is that it? Just so that it all happens all over again?

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Right now, he's playing defense, and simply trying to prevent the election from being rigged too badly by the Republicans

I agree that the Democrats need to be far more ambitious; how much they can be will depend very much on the size of the majority they win. Last time, they couldn't pass anything more than a budget — and even that required a coal baron to sign off on it — which is why the Inflation Reduction Act was structured the way it was.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago

No. Come on. Chuck was there when Obama squandered a majority. You can't wait until you know you'll win to even try. Leadership means making the case for doing what's right, not collecting a paycheck until conditions get so bad the voters demand action. Consevatives sure as shit don't wait until they have a majority to advance their agenda.

Of course, that's the problem. Chuck is a corporate-owned centrist hired to be opposition in name only. He's not the solution to any problem we face.

[–] The_Che_Banana@beehaw.org 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Plus he's really struggling with how to make sure they loose the mid terms...

[–] GeeDubHayduke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 15 hours ago

No he's not, they can do that in their sleep. The struggle is to trick viewers into believing they're actually trying, well, anything.