this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2026
174 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

82884 readers
3920 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world -3 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Only those cars that needed a breathalyzer for reasons.

Not much of a loss, I'd say.

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 4 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

Per bidens Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, that's going to be every new car starting this year

[–] HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 11 hours ago

Passive systems, not a breathalyzer. Still fucking stupid but one can disable the cameras or stop the vehicle from phoning home. They won't be able to disable your vehicle remotely and it appears to be more a while driving thing rather than a before driving thing.

[–] MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com 5 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Not sure how I didn't hear of this already. Apparently it's not necessarily a breathalyzer, but the proposals include a camera facing the driver to monitor them and passive monitoring of the air in the car.

I don't drunk drive and barely even drink, but that's horrifying. I can't believe this went under the radar for me.

More garbage that is going to break and cost thousands of dollars to fix in addition to all the violations of privacy. Cars are already advertising to people. Can you imagine if they put a camera inside the vehicle? Why not invest in public transit? That's a great way to decrease impaired drivers of all stripes as well as help people in general. All this does is funnel more money into auto makers. I am so upset that this is the first I'm hearing of it.

[–] kungen@feddit.nu 1 points 15 hours ago

Can you imagine if they put a camera inside the vehicle?

There are already cameras inside most new cars, but the purpose is to see if you're nodding off when driving and such. It's a good thing to keep unsafe drivers off the road. The bad thing is the lack of privacy regulation.

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 0 points 17 hours ago

Yeah I'd actually prefer a breathalyzer if they feel they need to do something

[–] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 2 points 17 hours ago

2027 mandates every car have this. Its infuriating.