this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2026
259 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

83728 readers
1200 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] OldQWERTYbastard@lemmy.world 92 points 3 weeks ago (14 children)

And here I was thinking these blow-and-go contraptions were self contained. I should have known better.

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 55 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

They want to be able to remotely disable vehicles, but in the process have made us vulnerable to all sophisticated actors to do so. Our leaders have their priorities all screwed up.

[–] teft@piefed.social 36 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Once again proving backdoors are fucking idiotic.

[–] Archr@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

Not sure that I would really agree that these are backdoor. Since disabling the vehicle remotely is kinda the express intention of this device. Just a consequence of how they designed them to not be circumvented by the operator.

[–] Honse@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Why is remote access the intention? Should the device not verify the alchohol % locally and then mechanically allow the car to star or not? What part of that needs any form of remote oversight?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 8 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)

Since disabling the vehicle remotely is kinda the express intention of this device

Uhhh nope, there's no reason for a remote connection.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] WesternInfidels@feddit.online 48 points 3 weeks ago

This is a great story to illuminate the large number of problems that could be addressed by decent public transit, better options for walking and biking, etc.

[–] HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone 33 points 3 weeks ago (35 children)

Boo for the cyber attack but fuck people who drive drunk repeatedly to the point of needing an interlock device. Maybe don't drink and drive you fucking sack of shit.

[–] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 26 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Fuck the lock, ban them from driving. Inexcusable.

[–] kunaltyagi@programming.dev 9 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Driving under the influence is a ban able offence (reckless endangerment) in most countries.

So is a proper driver's ed before giving even a learner's permit. US loves giving a multi ton killing machine to untrained people with impulse control. And teenagers

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] iSeth@lemmy.ml 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Perfect solution. Really needs public transit or walkable cities to work so win-win.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ChillCapybara@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Comments sections. Where nuance goes to die. All context is flattened and your views must be expressed as black or white lest you get branded as having the wrong opinion.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] MIDItheKID@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Not-so hot take: the underlying issue is lack of public transportation.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] stickyprimer@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Never knew anyone who had one, but a friend of mine dated a guy who did. He would beg her to breathe into it for him.

[–] TwilitSky@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

That's insane but as an alcoholic I can absolutely see someone doing it.

Some are social butterflies who have to be out and about but talk about not learning lessons.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] darkkite@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

you only need to get caught once for the lock

[–] Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

It's a shame that it's only when they get caught. There's no excuse for driving drunk.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (31 replies)
[–] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 18 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Hegseth is gonna be even more angry than born normal when he can't drive from point a to point b because of this.

[–] criss_cross@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

That’s why he lives in the base. So he doesn’t have to admit he got his license revoked.

[–] UniversalBasicJustice@quokk.au 3 points 3 weeks ago

To be fair, I too would be angry had I been born normal.

[–] Greyghoster@aussie.zone 12 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

How are these people planning to drive? The cost of fuel is excruciating! If it wasn’t because of Operation Epstein Fury, driving may have been an option.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] skulkbane@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Internet connected breathalyzer... May I ask why? If they need periodic recalibrations all of them don't need it right now no?

Play stupid games win stupid prizes.

[–] BanMe@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

I had one disable my car in rush hour traffic in another city on a roadtrip, they had no way to do anything to get me back up and running. I assume this is for those kinds of cases. I was taking up a lane on the interstate with a cop staring at me, trying to hum the little fucker back to life while a tow truck came.

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

A "cyberattack"? Or vibe coded AI slop running as intended?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ClydapusGotwald@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Hot take but if you need a breathalyzer to drive you don’t deserve to drive anymore.

[–] pazuzuzu@leminal.space 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I think it as undone, but there was a very serious plan to put breathalyzers in all cars. This cyberattack should give people some pause. https://www.jalopnik.com/the-in-car-breathalyzer-is-only-a-few-years-away-1850268311/

[–] Godric@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

Yessss, we need more tracking in your day to day because drunks, yesssss, or the children, yessss, or uh, err, uhhh, teenagers, yessssss!

Please give us all your data! For safety reasons, yesssssa

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›