PC Gaming

Confirmation bias and closed mindedness it is.

https://developer.nvidia.com/blog/nvidia-dlss-4-5-delivers-super-resolution-upgrades-and-new-dynamic-multi-frame-generation/

(DLSS 4.5)

DLSS 4 introduced a transformer model architecture with NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50 Series GPUs. That enabled a leap in image quality over our previous convolutional neural network. The second-gen transformer model for DLSS 4.5 Super Resolution uses 5x more compute and is trained on an expanded data set, so it has greater context awareness of every scene and more intelligent use of pixel sampling and motion vectors.

"It AlTeRs ThE fINaL iMaGe So It GeNeRaTeS iMaGe DaTa" at this point. I don't think you are even bothering to check just how many things you could call image generation at that point.

you took Nvidia’s news post’s wording as gospel.

"ThE dEvElOpEr Is LyInG!"

NVIDIA might be many things, in marketing particularly so, but in this particular blog it is not. Then again, it's like what I said:

Perhaps what you are actually referring to is the tendency for people to justify lying and throwing shade about a thing if they hate the thing associated with it enough.

Ergo, now nothing NVIDIA says can be trusted now. If you were going to be this reductive, not sure why you didn't open with this. It's a clear win from your perspective, but I don't think there's any hope of a shared reality between us. It's all a lie by big corpo, after all.

It's funny how you complain about me not providing more links, while calling the most direct ones lies. All I would have done is having to subject a creator to the same sort of shade you are trying to throw at me. After all, if the primary source of information is lying, those reporting it are just spreading lies.

Not gonna subject other people to downvotes and harassment from assholes, they get enough of that already. I'm afraid you'll just have to disingenuously act as if you can't perform searches yourself or that they exist.

I already was pretty certain nothing that I said could convince you, but it's going to be so funny when in a few months this take becomes so obviously bad. I like to type and edit, sue me, although it's also funny how quickly you also decided to participate in the endeavor. Call it a chance to disengage.

It's just tragic how having the capacity to know better, some people fool themselves. This is not image generation, buddy, and that's what AI slop typically refers to. The term AI has long preceded the term AI slop.

Sorry, gonna have a wonderful day.

I call it how I see it - close minded because of how set you are arguing against something that seems rather evident, an asshole because you downvote first and don't provide explanations without an ordeal of an interaction that immediately begins with belittling me with false claims (there was plenty of backing up you skipped over with your downvotes across the threads), and compared to MAGA because they are just such an evident example of people stuck in their own bubble through extreme confirmation bias and closed mindedness. I could be more respectful, but were you?

I think at this point in time, we have to come up with a term for these sort of threads: circlejerk slop. Guys, stop making generative AI look good, as bad as it is I'd choose it any day of the week over these circlejerk hallucinations. Do not expect them to carry across time and place.

I've actually just been corrected, this was referred to employ some form of generative AI by Jensen, who presumably did not lie in this instance. It's also significantly different enough to what I generally thought of as AI slop and my issues with it that it could also be said that I am a supporter of generative AI now. I am surprised by the application of the label, but it does prove me wrong.