this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2026
64 points (94.4% liked)

PC Gaming

14233 readers
834 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
EXiLExJD@lemmy.ca
UncleBadTouch@lemmy.ca
KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
64
Bethesda says Nvidia's controversial new DLSS 5 AI filter "will all be under our artists' control, and totally optional for players" (www.gamesradar.com)
submitted 18 hours ago by inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world to c/pcgaming@lemmy.ca
51 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Uh huh...

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TheObviousSolution@lemmy.ca -4 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

Is relying on the NVIDIA release and developer blogs as the primary source the misinformation? Because that's what I'm relying on my basis. If not, could you clear it up, what is the misinformation I'm spreading?

Is the misinformation present here? - https://lemmy.ca/post/61897561/22253720

Or here? - https://lemmy.ca/post/61900649/22251320

I just want to make sure what you consider misinformation, because it might be something I consider fact, and it might just be a controversial opinion under the circumstances. If it is something I consider fact, I'm not going to argue it, but you are going to have to tell me what it actually is so that I censor myself.

In regards to my attitude, I'll be nicer and just suffer the downvotes for relying on primary sources, it's partly my fault since I already suspected that the conversation would not be fruitful, given the downvotes and initial premise.

Is it a limited to this particular community, or to the account?

[–] recursive_recursion@piefed.ca 7 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

From your own link

NVIDIA ACE is a suite of AI technologies—spanning models, developers tools, and on-device inference—that’s designed to help middleware and game developers build knowledgeable, actionable, and conversational in-game characters. The NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2 model is now available through NVIDIA ACE as an In-game Inferencing (IGI) SDK plugin. It simplifies the integration within your gaming pipeline and optimizes simultaneous AI inference and graphics processing for accelerated game performance

and on NVIDIA's own DLSS 5 announcement page:

“Twenty-five years after NVIDIA invented the programmable shader, we are reinventing computer graphics once again,” said Jensen Huang, founder and CEO of NVIDIA. “DLSS 5 is the GPT moment for graphics — blending handcrafted rendering with generative AI to deliver a dramatic leap in visual realism while preserving the control artists need for creative expression.”

NVIDIA's entire page is AI summaries and AI xyz tool, sdk, etc. Clearly they're marketing this and are not hiding it.

Again, please take some time to reconsider before making condescending trollish posts. This kind of behavior is not tollerated on our instance.

Final warning. If you consider continuing to act in bad faith you will be banned.

[–] TheObviousSolution@lemmy.ca -4 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

I stand corrected, I would not have referred to the process being described as generative AI, and neither did the sources I watched. Thank you for the clarification. I wasn't acting in bad faith, which unfortunately means I will have to take greater care, as something that I did not intend to seems to be happening, and it is under a rather broad definition. I'll lay off of the topic, and thank you for the rather direct rebuttal, I would like to think I would have accepted it had it been offered elsewhere in the thread.

Feel free to bring up any other concerns, specially in case your warning extends beyond any other behavior beyond the current topic.