this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2026
318 points (100.0% liked)

News

36419 readers
2522 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Donald Trump threatened on Sunday to withhold his signature from all bills until Congress passes a GOP-led voting bill that implements voter restrictions ahead of the November midterms.

“I, as President, will not sign other Bills until this is passed, AND NOT THE WATERED DOWN VERSION – GO FOR THE GOLD: MUST SHOW VOTER I.D. & PROOF OF CITIZENSHIP: NO MAIL-IN BALLOTS EXCEPT FOR MILITARY – ILLNESS, DISABILITY, TRAVEL,” Trump posted on his social media platform, Truth Social.

The bill, called the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act, or SAVE America Act, requires individuals to show citizenship documents to register to vote and strict forms of photo ID to cast a ballot. If passed, the legislation would also administer criminal penalties for election officials who register anyone lacking the required documents.

As my colleague Ari Berman wrote in February, the bill would potentially block tens of millions of Americans from voting. Nine percent of American citizens, or approximately 21 million people, don’t have ready access to citizenship documents. The bill may impact millions of US citizens in other ways: tens of millions of women who took their partner’s last name, for example, may not have a birth certificate that matches their legal name could find it more difficult to register.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dhork@lemmy.world 24 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

How do you get your ID document? Does it cost a lot to get? Does any official look at perfectly valid ID and say "I don't think that's real, so you don't get to vote"?

We have no national ID here, the closest thing to prove citizenship is a passport but people are not required to have one, and it is expensive. For most people, the only definitive proof of citizenship they have is their original birth certificate.

That is why here, in the US, when politicians push Voter ID laws it's mainly to disenfranchise poor people.

[–] certified_expert@lemmy.world -2 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (3 children)

I once hard (here) that people in USA is kind of against having an ID document.

It ended up anyway giving them one of the crappiest IDs in any country: SSNs

to answer your questions: it is super cheap (~5 US dollars), fast, has many security systems, it is quickly verifyable agains government databases, it has a photo, your signature, and, if valid, nobody will question it.

It looks like a mini version of the plastic card in mdern pastports (of the size of a credit card)

The police can stop you and without probable cause ask you for your ID (and car/driving documents if in a car), check it against the national database, and give it back to you. You have to show it (required by law) and it is your responsibility (if you are over 18) to keep it with you. The intention is to catch people with pending charges or arrest orders and stuff. If you are not hiding from the law, it is a simple, civilized interaction that would take you 2~5 mins.

You know, the kind of things that you would expect from a 3rd world country, less developed than USA.

[–] fizzle@quokk.au 6 points 8 hours ago

The police can stop you and without probable cause ask you for your ID

Here in Australia this would be considered a draconian overreach and an invasion of privacy.

You're not required to carry ID generally, and in my state you're not even required to carry your driver's license when driving. They might ask you some details so they can look you up, and they might ask you to bring your id to a police station within 48 hours, but honestly I've never had that happen.

You're describing the requirement to carry ID like its just a basic feature of modern society, but not all societies work that way.

In the SE Asian countries I've visited national IDs are more common because of porous borders. Checkpoints on highways are opportunities to exploit migrant workers, basically.

[–] Jyek@sh.itjust.works 9 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

SSN are not an ID. Well they aren't meant to be an ID. It's just a number assigned to every citizen eligible for an account with the Social Security Administration. It just so happens that this is a convenient, unique number that every citizen has to use to get a job (employees pay into social security with each pay check) so it's been used to identify people by their numbers.

[–] 5too@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Well they aren’t meant to be an ID.

Mine still has that expressly printed on the back, "NOT A VALID FORM OF IDENTIFICATION" or something like that.

[–] certified_expert@lemmy.world -3 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

It is an ID. A crappy one, but ID, by definition!: it was created to identify people

[–] Jyek@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 hours ago

It is strictly NOT an ID. It is an account number. Your bank account number is not an ID either. This is the same idea, except ID is what it is being used for.

[–] Crazyslinkz@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Strange for an id to say its not a valid id. 🤔

https://www.ssa.gov/history/ssn/ssnversions.html

Not For Identification.

[–] aceshigh@lemmy.world -1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

The number isn’t unique. There are people with the same ss number as you.

[–] Crazyslinkz@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)
[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 7 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

SSN isn't proof of anything except eligibility for Social Security benefits. Yes, the system is abused to cover for the lack of a national ID, but it isn't an ID.

[–] rozodru@piefed.world 5 points 9 hours ago

exactly. Non-citizens can get a SSN. I had one when I lived in the US a couple decades ago and all I had was a green card. It was one of the first things I got. I was surprised when I got it cause it was literally paper. here in Canada when they used to give them out they were on a plastic card, I don't even think they even give you a card here anymore because it's more of a liability than anything to just have a plastic card with your social insurance number on it.

[–] certified_expert@lemmy.world -1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Well... an ID is whatever can be used to identify you. Whether it was or not initially envisioned for that. And the SSN does that, to some extend

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Cool. Doesn't change the fact that it's not valid ID for the purposed "prove you're a citizen" bill, so it's mostly irrelevant to this discussion. It doesn't even prove citizenship.

[–] certified_expert@lemmy.world -1 points 5 hours ago

Being an ID and being proof of citizenship are two orthogonal ideas.

The SSN is the former, but not the latter.

The sentence "an ID to proof your citizenship" is misconstructed.

IDs and Proofs of something are both subclasses of "documents". The correct phrase would be: "a document to prove citizenship".

That document could (in principle) not identify you, but at the same time demonstrate that you are a citizen (for example, you could have a long cryptographic self-validated number that hashes to a "Yes", or "Invalid"). But of course that's not too practical.