this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2026
513 points (98.1% liked)

Privacy

46790 readers
1322 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The installation was very easy! It's very greatful that my data doesn't send to Google any more.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lennee@lemmy.world 99 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

im still waiting for the linux phone of my dreams tbh

[–] pedroapero@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I feel my old n900 will remain the only one I ever had...

[–] macros@feddit.org 1 points 5 hours ago

Still have it?You can try maemo Leste on it. https://maemo-leste.github.io/

Far from usable as daily phone, but they are making good progress despite their small team. Dillo works as Browser for sites without js, SMS works well, calls are possible, Bluetooth is missing but everything else pretty much works.

Of course the 256MB RAM pose a heavy limit for todays apps. You have to choose ones which use it sparingly. E.g. mupdf, gnumeric instead of libreoffice and so on.

But its awesome for mobile ssh and, little games like SNES ones. I am starting to use it as second phone.

[–] humanamerican@lemmy.zip 56 points 20 hours ago (5 children)

Graphene really is the next best thing. If you can get your hands on a used Pixel or splurge for a new one, you won't regret converting. At least until there's a production-ready gnuPhone

[–] Melobol@lemmy.ml 26 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (6 children)

I don't really understand why Pixel is that evryone likes/they support.
I can't accept the fact that there is no external sd card support.
I believe I am getting old because I am very stuck on this point, even more than the headphone jack.

Nevermind I just saw Motorola is actually making a deal with gaphene OS. They were my next future phone with sd cards and even styluses- if this goes through, can't wait!

[–] Anivia@feddit.org 1 points 7 hours ago

Do you mean internal SD card slot? Because pixels absolutely support external sd cards

[–] TheOubliette@lemmy.ml 38 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

Pixels are the main target of aftermarket ROMs because they are reference Android devices with highly available unlocked developer modes. Most companies producing phones do things like add propriety changes that require substantial workarounds for relatively basic hardware functionality and make it much more difficult to even install an aftermarket ROM.

Really this is all a consequence of capitalism itself and the need to lock in ecosystems to establish controlled markets (allowing for controlling one's own profit). Every phone could be fully unlockable and hackable by the end user, but companies specifically prevent this in order to maximize their own profits.

[–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 17 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (10 children)

Apple did a hell of a job teaching people that means it’s more fancy.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Melobol@lemmy.ml 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I see! Thanks for this explanation.

[–] TheOubliette@lemmy.ml 2 points 15 hours ago

No problem friend. It is fairly hard to handle all those other phones - see how LineageOS keeps it's supported list fairly small!

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 11 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

I also like having expanded storage. But if you actually care about privacy?

You want the minimum amount of data on your phone at any given time. Your recent camera roll, any cached music and apps, and that is really it. Everything should be offloaded to your private storage ASAP

Because for as shit as google and apple are? You can also remote wipe those devices. less effective if it is a government agent that has it, but it is a thing. And, depending on the storage setup, that sd card might be raw dogging it to begin with.

[–] defaultusername@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

It shouldn't be difficult for a custom ROM like GrapheneOS to make the user explicitly allow a microSD card to be mounted if that would cause any security issues.

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 6 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

And welcome to software development. Every feature needs time (money), engineers (money), and testing (money). With most testing continuing in perpetuity because any pull request could break it.

And when you add on that graphene is a nonprofit baked FOSS project... Well, if it is as simple as you think it is then get to making a pull request, I guess?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MolochHorridus@lemmy.ml 1 points 18 hours ago

Couldn’t you encrypt the SD card? And while you’re at it encrypt the internal storage also. Linux should support that, right?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MooseWinooski@lemmy.ca 8 points 20 hours ago

It is because there are hardware security features that most other Android phones do not support and Graphene OS is going for maximum security and privacy. Besides, they're coming out with their own hardware by partnering with Motorola shortly.

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 4 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

I can't accept the fact that there is no external sd card support.

OK, this is going to sound dismissive, and I really don't mean it to be. But why?

For data transfer, you can still use the USB port (I do it all the time). Other than that, there's more than enough storage available onboard for any reasonable amount of usage. I don't even really keep anything critical on my device at all, so what there is is kind of overkill already.

I just don't understand the need for an SD card with storage being as plentiful now as it is. I want to understand.

[–] cdzero@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 hour ago

If you want to carry your whole music library around, a big SD card makes that work. I understand streaming is the trendy thing and I was using Navidrome myself, but I rolled back my plan and switched to SD card for it. I've saved money.

Another use case is for carrying a heap of ROMs. I've also done this until I realised gaming on my phone was uncomfortable and bought a dedicated device.

Having the SD card wasn't a dealbreaker for me when I bought this phone but I do really like having it.

[–] degen@midwest.social 2 points 19 hours ago

An ezpz 256 gigs without spending an extra $200 used to be orgasmic is all I can say

[–] Melobol@lemmy.ml 1 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

I'm a data hog. Storage is cheap and it should be available on my phone also.
People always saying physical Media is important, and most of the time they tink of cds and dvds.
I use my sd cards for physical Media sorage.
I used my camera and accidentally recorded 40 gigs of video.
With external card I do not have to worry.
Music, books, picture heavy pdfs, movies full tv series sits comfortably in my palm.

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Interesting. Thanks for letting me know.

I think of myself as a data hog also, but only on my computer; I'm mostly a minimalist on my phone.

[–] Melobol@lemmy.ml 1 points 14 hours ago

It really depends on how much you are using your phone.
If I would go back 20 years I would be attached to my desktop pc and my ebook reader pocket pc. ln that case I would not need extra storage for my phone. Tho thinking of it... I had two different external cards for that handheld even back then. :)

[–] gnuthing@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 16 hours ago

I use an encrypted offline raid at home and encrypted cloud storage that automatically backs up. My phone is basically empty, plenty of room to accidentally record 40 gb+

[–] humanamerican@lemmy.zip 3 points 19 hours ago

I feel your pain on storage and headphones but Graphene is worth the sacrifice to me. I also like that my 8a will get updates until at least 2030.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 7 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

I'd argue that Graphene is a better thing since it's based on an OS that's been designed for mobile from the ground up. I expect it's going to be a while before Linux UX on mobile catches up to desktop, but Graphene works great already.

[–] alastel@lemmy.ml 7 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Sad thing is that Linux used to be ahead on phones. Everyone swore by N900 and it was sabotaged by ms buykilling Nokia.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 5 points 18 hours ago

It would've been a cool world if we got Linux that could work seamlessly between desktop and mobile. Imagine if you had architecture where apps were built as services with an API, and then you could connect either desktop or mobile UI to them. Heck, at that point you could even make custom UIs across apps, or pipe them together the way you do with shell scripts. And then you could also have a device like a phone which has all your apps and data, and you could plug it into a dock with more memory, GPU, etc. So, you wouldn't have to juggle a bunch of devices and sync data between them.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

By those standards, Halium + ubports might be worth while, it's using enough of the android binaries to get the job done but is still real linux.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

For most use cases though, you don't really have much of a benefit of running Linux over Android on a phone though. There's enough Linux compatibility on Android already to make it work seamlessly with your Linux devices. In my opinion, as long as the stack is open source and well supported, it doesn't really matter whether it's Android or Linux based.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 3 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

The binary blobs handling drivers are both the rub AND the part we can't seem to work without.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 3 points 16 hours ago

reverse engineering this stuff is pretty challenging unfortunately

[–] chicocheco@lemmy.world 4 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

Is it actually usable for everyday stuff though? I heard that bank apps are pain in the ass among other things. Maybe this new deal with Motorola changes things.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 4 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

You can install Google app store in a container, and all the apps I've used work fine on it out of the box. It absolutely works fine as a daily driver.

[–] chicocheco@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago

That’s great! Well, I think I’ll give a shot when my iPhone dies.

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

You can't do mobile deposit, but surely you can still just use the bank's website.

[–] humanamerican@lemmy.zip 2 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I can do mobile deposit with both my credit union and Discover.

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago

Well, I stand corrected. Even less reason to not switch to Graphene.

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 2 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

what about something like fairphone? why is pixel better?

[–] kuhli@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 16 hours ago

Graphene only supports pixels currently.

They have hardware encryption tech other phones don't have that graphene uses

[–] humanamerican@lemmy.zip 1 points 13 hours ago

Fairphone can't run Graphene and the other de-Googled Android ROMs that it can run aren't nearly as secure

[–] WolfmanEightySix@piefed.social 2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Bahnd@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

The Pinephone was a fun expiriment. I want that pinboard switch on other devices, but the linux dev/update cycle is very unconducive to the needs of most daily drivers.

[–] lennee@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago

what kinds update cycle do you mean? cuz with a bigger userbase that will be greatly improved im sure, i use arch (btw) and i would love a similar experience on a phone. Maybe librephone will get the stone rolling. One can dream.