this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2026
175 points (100.0% liked)

Chapotraphouse

14325 readers
757 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Beaver@hexbear.net 31 points 1 month ago

I used to be more critical of North Korea directing so much of their national output towards their military. My idea was that this was a false economy, and that building up their civilian sector would have expanded their national capacity at a pace where they would end up with more military capacity.

I see now that:

  1. They actually did make an effort to do that. but the collapse of the communist bloc and US sanctions made a long period of economic contraction inevitable.

  2. The North Korean state would have likely been invaded or bombed if it had not maintained a credible military deterrence. It's notable that they have never been the target of serious military action since the Korean War ended.