this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2026
175 points (100.0% liked)

Chapotraphouse

14326 readers
455 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jackmaoist@hexbear.net 32 points 1 month ago (1 children)

W Korea.

Nukes also give them the ability to decrease funding for the military and spend it on actual development.

Honestly I'm surprised that Iran didn't scramble to build dirty bombs or whatever after the previous attack.

[–] stink@lemmygrad.ml 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They're foolish for not doing so. Build a nuke, publicize a test on tel aviv, dont get fucked with anymore

[–] gay_king_prince_charles@hexbear.net 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

A strike on Tel-Aviv would result in Israeli and American retaliation, which would inevitably kill millions of Iranians. Refining the uranium needed for a single bomb takes years, and using your first nuclear weapon in a way that will inevitably lead to retaliatory strikes is an incredibly efficient way to not have a country anymore.

[–] stink@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 1 month ago

Yeah i said it in jest lol, realistically just bombing a random spot in the ocean DPRK style is enough