this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2026
127 points (100.0% liked)

news

24676 readers
774 users here now

Welcome to c/news! We aim to foster a book-club type environment for discussion and critical analysis of the news. Our policy objectives are:

We ask community members to appreciate the uncertainty inherent in critical analysis of current events, the need to constantly learn, and take part in the community with humility. None of us are the One True Leftist, not even you, the reader.

Newcomm and Newsmega Rules:

The Hexbear Code of Conduct and Terms of Service apply here.

  1. Link titles: Please use informative link titles. Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.

  2. Content warnings: Posts on the newscomm and top-level replies on the newsmega should use content warnings appropriately. Please be thoughtful about wording and triggers when describing awful things in post titles.

  3. Fake news: No fake news posts ever, including April 1st. Deliberate fake news posting is a bannable offense. If you mistakenly post fake news the mod team may ask you to delete/modify the post or we may delete it ourselves.

  4. Link sources: All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include the Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance) or at least strip out identifier information from the twitter link. There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source.

  5. Archive sites: We highly encourage use of non-paywalled archive sites (i.e. archive.is, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org) so that links are widely accessible to the community and so that reactionary sources don’t derive data/ad revenue from Hexbear users. If you see a link without an archive link, please archive it yourself and add it to the thread, ask the OP to fix it, or report to mods. Including text of articles in threads is welcome.

  6. Low effort material: Avoid memes/jokes/shitposts in newscomm posts and top-level replies to the newsmega. This kind of content is OK in post replies and in newsmega sub-threads. We encourage the community to balance their contribution of low effort material with effort posts, links to real news/analysis, and meaningful engagement with material posted in the community.

  7. American politics: Discussion and effort posts on the (potential) material impacts of American electoral politics is welcome, but the never-ending circus of American Politics© Brought to You by Mountain Dew™ is not welcome. This refers to polling, pundit reactions, electoral horse races, rumors of who might run, etc.

  8. Electoralism: Please try to avoid struggle sessions about the value of voting/taking part in the electoral system in the West. c/electoralism is right over there.

  9. AI Slop: Don't post AI generated content. Posts about AI race/chip wars/data centers are fine.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A reminder that as the US continues to threaten countries around the world, fedposting is to be very much avoided (even with qualifiers like "in Minecraft") and comments containing it will be removed.

Image is of a Quds Day march in Bandar Abbas, Iran.


It now seems likely that, very soon, the US and the Zionists will attempt to bomb Iran. Compared to the buildup to the Iraq War, the stated goals of such a move are being kept a little more generalized - some say the point is to overthrow the government for "humanitarian" purposes (others are more honest and want to partition Iran into a dozen powerless statelets). Some people instead say the point is to get rid of the ballistic missile program, which is synonymous with outright surrender, as no matter the deal, bombers would be en route within 10 minutes of the last batch being handed over.

Still others say that the goal is to destroy the Iranian nuclear program, which, as the thread title implies, is now in a bizarre propaganda superposition: it is apparently simultaneously true to the Trump administration that the US obliterated the nuclear facilities and set back Iran's nuclear program years, if not decades, but also that Iran is mere days away from finishing a nuke and a new round of bombing is urgently required. This obviously casts newfound doubts on how effective US weapons even are at penetrating Iran's underground facilities (though it doesn't necessarily mean they didn't breach them, as Iran was almost certainly moving nuclear material out of Fordow and other sites in the days before the Twelve Day War). The sheer quantity of US anti-air defense equipment they're shifting into position also casts doubts on whether Iran's air defense was mostly destroyed during that conflict, as those who assert that the Zionists had total air supremacy over Iran seem to be implying.

I'm not a military guy, and so I have no novel insights on how such a war is likely to go, nor do I feel confident predicting either side's victory. I'm looking at most of the same sources that you're all looking at. Some confidently boast of the total destruction of Iran's air defense within hours, allowing US planes to fly directly over Iranian cities and drop bombs en masse; others cast doubts on whether this will ever occur, and say that the US's limited supply of Tomahawk missiles is the only major firepower they will be able to safely unleash. Some say this war will last mere days before state collapse; others say months, maybe even years. I have no idea.

I do at least feel somewhat bolstered by the fact that Russia and China finally appear to be pouring in meaningful information and matériel to help Iran this time around, though of course, one can still debate whether it's enough. I feel like we are at the culmination of decades of war planning by both the US and Iran, and the result could have deep ramifications indeed.


Last week's thread is here.
The Imperialism Reading Group is here.

Please check out the RedAtlas!

The bulletins site is here. Currently not used.
The RSS feed is here. Also currently not used.

The Zionist Entity's Genocide of Palestine

If you have evidence of Zionist crimes and atrocities that you wish to preserve, there is a thread here in which to do so.

Sources on the fighting in Palestine against the temporary Zionist entity. In general, CW for footage of battles, explosions, dead people, and so on:

UNRWA reports on the Zionists' destruction and siege of Gaza and the West Bank.

English-language Palestinian Marxist-Leninist twitter account. Alt here.
English-language twitter account that collates news.
Arab-language twitter account with videos and images of fighting.
English-language (with some Arab retweets) Twitter account based in Lebanon. - Telegram is @IbnRiad.
English-language Palestinian Twitter account which reports on news from the Resistance Axis. - Telegram is @EyesOnSouth.
English-language Twitter account in the same group as the previous two. - Telegram here.

Mirrors of Telegram channels that have been erased by Zionist censorship.

Russia-Ukraine Conflict

Examples of Ukrainian Nazis and fascists
Examples of racism/euro-centrism during the Russia-Ukraine conflict

Sources:

Defense Politics Asia's youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful.
Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section.
Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war.
Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don't want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it's just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.
Simplicius, who publishes on Substack. Like others, his political analysis should be soundly ignored, but his knowledge of weaponry and military strategy is generally quite good.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists' side.

Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.

Pro-Russian Telegram Channels:

Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.

https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR's former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR's forces. Russian language.
https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one.
https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts.
https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster's telegram channel.
https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator.
https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps.
https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a 'propaganda tax', if you don't believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses.
https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.

Pro-Ukraine Telegram Channels:

Almost every Western media outlet.
https://discord.gg/projectowl ~ Pro-Ukrainian OSINT Discord.
https://t.me/ice_inii ~ Alleged Ukrainian account with a rather cynical take on the entire thing.


you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kleeon@hexbear.net 81 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)
[–] segfault11@hexbear.net 45 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

the straits are not okay 😔

[–] kleeon@hexbear.net 29 points 2 weeks ago

wait until they close the gay of hormuz

[–] vovchik_ilich@hexbear.net 18 points 2 weeks ago

That's insanely funny

[–] ElChapoDeChapo@hexbear.net 13 points 2 weeks ago

Now this is tagline material right here chefs-kiss

[–] BanMeFromPosting@hexbear.net 17 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

I've never understood the hype around the Strait of Hormuz. It borders Iran, Iraq and Saudi Arabia. And Saudi Arabia has another coastline, so they're kinda not too badly impacted? I am definitely missing something, would love for a comrade to shoot me a good link or text.

[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 34 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

You'll understand when oil and gas prices go through the roof because 20% of the world's needed supply is no longer supplying.

If you need any fuel, I suggest going to get it right now. This is going to affect all of us.

[–] BanMeFromPosting@hexbear.net 14 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

But that's my question. I've never understood why that supply couldn't be rerouted to the other coastline. I get that a lot of shipping is running through there, I just don't understand the infrastructure that makes it so it can't run through at the other harbours the very same countries have.

[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 25 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Pipelines run straight to the coast and then fill there. Transporting it elsewhere is not impossible but is a massive logistical undertaking. We're talking about 20 million barrels of oil.... Per day

[–] BanMeFromPosting@hexbear.net 20 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I gotta get outta map-game-brain. I understand why Nordstream 2 was a big deal, but suddenly I stop understanding lol. Thanks for explaining it in simple terms.

[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 29 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It's the sheer scale of things that's difficult to understand with gamer brain.

[–] BanMeFromPosting@hexbear.net 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

And I'm even a civil engineer lol, this is the kind of stuff I work with. Incredibly embarrassing.

[–] CarmineCatboy2@hexbear.net 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

To be fair, the map-games have only now started to try and incorporate this sort of logistics and there's an upper limit to what they can do.

[–] BanMeFromPosting@hexbear.net 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

In all honesty I don't even play them. I enjoy CK3 and Stellaris once in a while, but HOI IV was never for me. And I always end up cheating.

[–] CarmineCatboy2@hexbear.net 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Never cared much for the very idea of a game set in a single war rather than a time period more broadly speaking, so I'm right with you there.

[–] BanMeFromPosting@hexbear.net 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It's also so very deterministic and it reduces politics to a ridiculous fascimile. Not to mention geopolitics, diplomacy and so on. I do enjoy that they vindicate Stalin's purges though, that is funny.

[–] CarmineCatboy2@hexbear.net 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

i think on some level you kinda have to 'vindicate' everyone. its the ww2 battle royale game. the soviet union has to be able to win, as it historically did, and you need credible reasons for that. the timescale for HoI4 is miniscule. map games tend to be more deterministic depending on how early you are in the game, and with the framing of a ww2 game you'll always be close to that deterministic start position. you aren't gonna play a china that is 100 years removed from the civil war.

[–] BanMeFromPosting@hexbear.net 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

No I meant he's vindicated in the sense that if you don't carry out the purges you get a massive revolution, which is exactly why he did it, but ahistorical liberals claim he was paranoid and authoritarian and just doing it to seize power.
But by putting the revolution in the game, Stalin is proven right. He had to carry out the purges.

(In the perspective of an ahistorical liberal) It would sort of be like if you had an option to do the Holocaust as Nazi Germany, and if you don't do it a Judeo-Bolshevik conspiracy makes you gay and black.

[–] CarmineCatboy2@hexbear.net 4 points 2 weeks ago

(In the perspective of an ahistorical liberal) It would sort of be like if you had an option to do the Holocaust as Nazi Germany, and if you don't do it a Judeo-Bolshevik conspiracy makes you gay and black.

oh yeah i was sorta thinking on those terms as well but was struggling to put it into words. definitely true.

[–] cfgaussian@lemmygrad.ml 18 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

The same infrastructure just doesn't exist elsewhere in the region. You can't just magically re-route the pipelines. They would have to transport oil by truck hundreds of kilometers through the desert to ports that are not set up for those volumes of export anyway. This transport infrastructure takes years if not decades to build.

[–] OrionsMask@hexbear.net 7 points 2 weeks ago

I'm sure there is an explanation but I too would like to know.

[–] ThomasMuentzner@hexbear.net 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

the hole oil infrastructure is pumping to the Docks in the Gulf , from the Oilfileds where it is loaded onto the tankers that then have to pass the hormuz straight.

and the Gas comes from the Gulf directly.

[–] kleeon@hexbear.net 28 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

A quarter of world's oil passes through Hormuz and good portion of natural gas. Don't forget about UAE, Qatar, Bahrain, Kuwait and Iraq - they essentially lose the means to ship their oil out if the stait is closed

[–] BanMeFromPosting@hexbear.net 11 points 2 weeks ago

The UAE too? Damn okay then it all makes sense. Gotta re-up my geography remembrance. I kinda figured the tiny places like Qatar were basically just airbases and didn't hold any actual resources. Thanks for the explainer

[–] mkultrawide@hexbear.net 22 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

20% of the world's petroleum passes through the Strait of Hormuz, to say nothing of refined products, and the Gulf in increasingly a global logistics hub where goods are shipped to the be redistributed globally.

[–] BanMeFromPosting@hexbear.net 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

And longer term those 20% couldn't be shipped from the other harbours the countries have outside of the strait? I figured it was just a situation of "we haven't moved our logistics hubs because it would be cumbersome and expensive and there's really no need." But it seems like there's something that makes it so that is impossible.

[–] mkultrawide@hexbear.net 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The UAE has a pipeline that go to Khor Fukkan and Fujairah that are basically for this exact situation, although the former is more of a container shipping hub, but the Iranians have shown before the have the capability to disable ships leaving that port.

[–] BanMeFromPosting@hexbear.net 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Ah okay, so it's gonna have an impact, but long term something will either be set up or those places are going to burn too? Love to live on interesting times yay.
Very kind of Israel to wait until spring so the heating bill isn't hit as hard.

[–] mkultrawide@hexbear.net 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I doubt they have the ability to reroute much of the affected oil production through those pipelines. I'd have to check but I'd imagine at least the KSA ones operate at or near full capacity.

[–] BanMeFromPosting@hexbear.net 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Neat! Wonder if I should make a How To post on shoplifting ahead of the coming price hikes this will cause.

[–] piccolo@hexbear.net 4 points 2 weeks ago

timmy-pray if you could that would be amazing comrade

[–] ThomasMuentzner@hexbear.net 16 points 2 weeks ago

Houthies closed the gates of grief as well.

[–] demeritum@lemmygrad.ml 14 points 2 weeks ago

Close the straight, destroy the economy, make the people happy.