news
Welcome to c/news! We aim to foster a book-club type environment for discussion and critical analysis of the news. Our policy objectives are:
-
To learn about and discuss meaningful news, analysis and perspectives from around the world, with a focus on news outside the Anglosphere and beyond what is normally seen in corporate media (e.g. anti-imperialist, anti-Zionist, Marxist, Indigenous, LGBTQ, people of colour).
-
To encourage community members to contribute commentary and for others to thoughtfully engage with this material.
-
To support healthy and good faith discussion as comrades, sharpening our analytical skills and helping one another better understand geopolitics.
We ask community members to appreciate the uncertainty inherent in critical analysis of current events, the need to constantly learn, and take part in the community with humility. None of us are the One True Leftist, not even you, the reader.
Newcomm and Newsmega Rules:
The Hexbear Code of Conduct and Terms of Service apply here.
-
Link titles: Please use informative link titles. Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.
-
Content warnings: Posts on the newscomm and top-level replies on the newsmega should use content warnings appropriately. Please be thoughtful about wording and triggers when describing awful things in post titles.
-
Fake news: No fake news posts ever, including April 1st. Deliberate fake news posting is a bannable offense. If you mistakenly post fake news the mod team may ask you to delete/modify the post or we may delete it ourselves.
-
Link sources: All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include the Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance) or at least strip out identifier information from the twitter link. There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source.
-
Archive sites: We highly encourage use of non-paywalled archive sites (i.e. archive.is, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org) so that links are widely accessible to the community and so that reactionary sources don’t derive data/ad revenue from Hexbear users. If you see a link without an archive link, please archive it yourself and add it to the thread, ask the OP to fix it, or report to mods. Including text of articles in threads is welcome.
-
Low effort material: Avoid memes/jokes/shitposts in newscomm posts and top-level replies to the newsmega. This kind of content is OK in post replies and in newsmega sub-threads. We encourage the community to balance their contribution of low effort material with effort posts, links to real news/analysis, and meaningful engagement with material posted in the community.
-
American politics: Discussion and effort posts on the (potential) material impacts of American electoral politics is welcome, but the never-ending circus of American Politics© Brought to You by Mountain Dew™ is not welcome. This refers to polling, pundit reactions, electoral horse races, rumors of who might run, etc.
-
Electoralism: Please try to avoid struggle sessions about the value of voting/taking part in the electoral system in the West. c/electoralism is right over there.
-
AI Slop: Don't post AI generated content. Posts about AI race/chip wars/data centers are fine.
view the rest of the comments
The Afghans could very well pull a major upset and penetrate deep into Pakistan, evicting the Pakistani army from large swathes of the western regions. The Taliban has had five years to build on the vast surpluses of equipment the US left behind, they have tens of thousands of soldiers with decades of combat experience, they know the mountains and the towns, the locals are sympathetic, and Pakistan has to keep large concentrations and assets on the Indian border in case Modi takes advantage
What a stupid risk for Islamabad to take, this could be June 2014 all over again
My money is definitely on the taliban here. They are significantly more experienced and it has not been long enough for those experiences to age out completely.
The taliban also have a major presence in Pakistan itself so...this could get interesting. Taliban, the next nuclear power?
I keep being reminded of This paper from 2018 that says the first world will survive the worst of climate change if the third world has a limited nuclear exchange specifically naming Pakistan and India. I think this is as close as the western governments get to having a plan to confront climate change and will not be surprised if it's revealed in some years down the line that the more cynically evil characters like Bannon and Miller have been trying to make it happen
Beyond the obvious objections, it seems like the effect on global temperatures would be gone within 20 years, so it'd be something like temporary sulfate aerosol injection with the same expected termination shock. You'd truly have to care about absolutely nothing beyond your own immediate existence, a singularity of solipsism, to think this is a good idea.
The Futurama bit with the giant block of ice, but it's a slightly larger nuclear exchange in the developing world each time.
Pretty sure in Futurama they also had global warming canceled out by nuclear winter...
Edit: yeah...
I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:
Unfortunately, Conservatives/fascists/Western chauvinists are exactly like this. In fact they'd salivate at the idea of a nuclear exchange between people they consider subhuman
thanks i hate it
Pakistan will just bomb them to bits with complete air superiority. The chances of a Taliban offensive succeeding beyond a few border posts are slim.
That's what NATO said
Exactly, I'm surprised that got so many upbears, I thought people here had a better memory than the average normie
Big difference between offense and defence. Against the US, the Taliban were on the defence as an insurgency, the US on the offensive. Now it's the opposite, the Taliban is on the offensive, trying to seize territory, and can't be insurgents trying to ambush attackers.
The Taliban in Afghanistan also lost every single major battle/engagement vs the USA. They didn't win a single large battle. They outlasted the US as an insurgency for 20 years despite that, while the USA pursued an always doomed to fail "nation building" plan. That's how the Taliban won the war on a strategic level. This is very different from invading Pakistan, holding territory, etc. Unless the Taliban plan to bait Pakistan into invading and occupying Afghanistan, they can't use that strategy.
Holy lib slop.
First of all Pakistan declared war, and are the ones bombing Afghanistan. How does your mind translate that into the Taliban being the aggressors?
Second, the Taliban have major strongholds in both Afghanistan and Pakistan, they aren't "invading" anything. The borderlands between Afghanistan and Pakistan have essentially been Taliban territory since before they were even the Taliban. These areas are also incredibly ethnically diverse. The nature of their struggle hasn't changed beyond Pakistan officially declaring itself an adversary. At the US' behest, no doubt.
That's literally the purpose of an insurgency. Avoid large, pitched battles and wage asymmetrical warfare and engage in a campaign of attrition. Which they executed flawlessly and kept the US and NATO from achieving ANY strategic objectives of their own. That's literally the very definition of a successful insurgency. Like, what are you even saying here lol
Don't fed jacket users because you misread their comment
Lmao wow, way to ignore the rest of the comment and copy + paste specific tidbits to form your own narrative. Talk about misreading
Is this the point where you accuse me of being a federal agent too?
Depends on if you're going to go ahead and justify western imperialism because a former western proxy bit the hand that fed it.
Yes Pakistan helped the Taliban for decades, which is why the betrayal is even more surprising. Complete rogue actor.
Not everyone that disagrees with you is a fed, if you think that way, it's just sad.
The US helped the Taliban for decades through pakistan. Then acted surprised when the Taliban rejected American imperialism. The Taliban hate anything to do with the west. And Pakistan is an American lapdog. What's happening here isn't surprising in the least if you actually understand.