Slop.

Gaslighting

Gaslighting is when you point out what a person is doing, when that person does not like being confronted with what it is they are doing.

A bad faith user pretended I believed Tourette's makes people develop racist beliefs. I never said this, I never believed it, and now multiple users have spread this lie,

A user pointed out the logical conclusion of the arguments you put forth. It was, and is, clear you attach a moral value to the tics.

I explained multiple times a medical condition can induce unintentional racist ACTIONS, not internal racist beliefs, ACTIONS, I clarified that distinction multiple times hence my point of intent does not erase impact

Come on, none of us are liberals here. We understand that just because you say one thing it does not stop you from doing another.
Here's what I think has happened: You consider yourself a leftist. A leftist isn't ableist, so obviously you aren't. When it was pointed out to you how what you were doing was ableist, you got super heated and didn't actually engage with the argument, because it was so obviously wrong, since you're a leftist. No reason to interrogate your own beliefs or arguments. And now you're locked up, getting more and more mad, because you keep getting confronted with your ableist arguments.

I have clarified multiple times intent does not negate impact, that implies I do NOT believe it was a conscious choice, again you're spreading lies

And you have multiple times put forth arguments that only function if it is a conscious choice. I'm not spreading lies, I'm just saying stuff you don't enjoy hearing.

In the very specific context of inflicting racial abuse on other people because of a neurological condition, then avoidance OR ANY OTHER harm reduction strategies become viable, because the harm is no longer individualized as racial abuse is a very specific thing, REGARDLESS OF INTENT

In other words: He should stay out of public view. This is not harm reduction, it is ableist.

This does not apply to most sufferers of Tourette's because racism (which does not require intent to be inflicted) is not synonymous with the typical inconvenience, annoyance, or uncomfortableness typical Tourette's sufferers deal with on an individual level

And here we have you attaching a moral value as well as implying some level of conscious choice on his part. He's separate from most sufferers, somehow. He's not typical. It's clear you don't actually understand what tourettes is or does, despite it being explained a bunch of times already.

I NEVER CLAIMED "he should stop having Tourettes" what a blatant lie

It's either that or stay out of public view, as I said. That's what people have pointed out to you a bunch of times before, yet you keep not engaging with it.

I said the impact of slurs is not something he has to deal with, his disability is the explanation for why it happened and he has to deal with his condition, that does not mean the n-word impacts him in any way similar to the way it impacted the cast of Sinners, again you're a liar and a weasel trying to twist my words, disengage and kick rocks

In a metaphor about tourettes being like a colostomy bag bursting, you argued that it was different because it didn't hurt him. You did not argue specifically as you claim to do now. Yet somehow I'm the one lying and twisting words.

Disengage

The disengage function is not a magical "get the last word" button. Attempting to use it as such is incredibly weasely lol. I think if you go and :logout: and come back in a day or so, you'll probably be less heated and realise how locked up you were beforehand.
It will probably be best for both of us if this interaction stops however, so I am going to stop replying. Hopefully this helps with getting you to cool off a bit.