this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2026
76 points (100.0% liked)
Slop.
805 readers
440 users here now
For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
It's clear you don't consider anything that happened that night to be actually harmful to Black people, because hey, "it wasn't intentional," and apparently that's all that matters to you, because in your mind intent can negate impact and any action taken to mitigate that impact is ableist since intent trumps the harm
I'm not wasting my time with people who lie, twist words and deny basic concepts of medical ethics
You are very mad about me "twisting your words" and "lying", but you keep doing the same yourself. Is this because you don't realise it or because you think it doesn't count when you do it? Of course I consider it harmful, as I have already said. I thought saying things meant you were immune to all accusations or logical conclusions? I personally think it would be fitting if he apologised. I don't think he is racist because of a tic, nor do I think it's racist to react negatively to arguments or behaviour like yours.
Call me crazy, but I don't think we should lock up people with tourettes, even when they say hurtful things.
Is medical ethics when you want to lock up people with tourettes and you attach moral values to their tics?
Kinda rich to hear you speak of medicine, when you so far have failed to engage with what tourettes is or does.
I love this. In the end they agree with you but still want to spit essays worth of bullshit at you just to make sure you know who's boss
Again, there's the crux of why your cracker brain doesn't understand a thing I'm saying, he doesn't need to BE a racist to perform racist ACTIONS, again intent does not negate impact
Now I want to lock them up and throw away the key!!!! As if avoidance of triggers isn't actually a real treatment plan for sufferers of Tourettes, do I really need to pull up a Tourette's advocate saying the exact same thing before it penetrates your skull, I mean I better not since the advocate in the link is Black and you may take issue with that. Fuck it, disengage and go yell at him https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FgaqKIxS4Hs
Great way to engage with text. Really nailing the debatebro vibe.
Buddy, I do not agree with you at all
See again you keep arguing against things I haven't said. Why do you insist on making discussion much more difficult? Why did you ignore it when I responded in detail last time? It seems like you're just doing this for the dopamine or something like that.
No, you just want to keep them out of public view. I suppose throwing away the key would help with that.
And again: If they do not follow this treatment or they are not far along it, then what? You have an incredibly narrow view of who is allowed to be part of public life.
So where have I said anything that would give you that idea? You've freaked out about me "twisting your words" and "being a lying weasel" for pointing out how you are being ableist. So I must assume you have a direct quote of me that points this out. Should I worry for him because he has tourettes and that might make you want him disappeared? Oh hey here's another black man talking about the situation.
Second time I'm telling you this, which is a great example of you not actually engaging with what people are writing: Disengage does not function like a "get the last word" button. It was actually implemented to protect our neurodivergent users - Both from getting into a viscious cycle of continuing a pointless argument, like we are doing, and from before we had the block function. Kinda fitting that you are misusing something originally intended for ND people.
I'll show you how to properly use it by your next reply - See how polite I am, I'm even letting you know so you can get the last word! Call me cracker all you want! Continue to read something I didn't write and argue against that!
You want to continue yapping? Go yell at him https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FgaqKIxS4Hs we're one-to-one on the assessment of the situation. Go weasal out on his page so I don't have to deal with your
hysterics
lmao yeah like me dumbass
disengage
I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:
Sir, this an incredibly reasonable, well thought-out, and visibly good faith reply, so I hesitate to even speak to one such as yourself, but, if I may, disengage must be the only word in your reply. It is not a spell you can trigger upon using other abilities. Mind the technicalities.
Fair enough, in this case I was following the lead of other users, but I've been around long enough I should know the in-and-outs of the technicalities
Thanks for the heads up
We must cherish these moments and opportunities.
I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy: