224
Kentucky man covered in fur arrested after he is found having sex with a deer, cops say
(www.independent.co.uk)
this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2026
224 points (97.5% liked)
Not The Onion
20563 readers
727 users here now
Welcome
We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!
The Rules
Posts must be:
- Links to news stories from...
- ...credible sources, with...
- ...their original headlines, that...
- ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”
Please also avoid duplicates.
Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.
And that’s basically it!
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I’m sorry, but given that the deer was dead, wasn’t this guy basically fucking a piece of venison?
Not that that makes it morally okay and I’m sure there are some indecent exposure type charges that apply, but the deer doesn’t care anymore, which is the point of bestiality laws
You don't want people killing deer just to have sex with them.
That's how you get Lyme disease.
Would you be ok if he fucked a human corpse? Dug it out, and fucked it?
-No Necrophillia -No Bestiality -No Pedophillia
Simple
I got a question about you morticians. You bang the dead bodies? I imagine stuff like that goes on all the time. I mean I don't give a shit. If I was dead you could bang me all you want. I mean who cares? A dead body is like a piece of trash. I mean shove as much shit in there as you want. Fill me up with cream,make a stew out of my ass. What's the big deal? Bang me, eat me, grind me up into little pieces, throw me in the river. Who gives a shit? You're dead, you're dead! Oh Shit! Is my mic on?
It's neither safe, sanitary, nor ok. Some people don't want to know that someone will fucking bang their corpse once they are dead. That used to be a person, and if the Torture Nexus guys have their way, will be again.
EDIT: Ok, fine. How many corpses do you need dug up? 20$ a piece for you to fuck.
But I fuck yours once you die.
TL;DR: I just know it's fucked up, but my arguments are weak.
If that were true our laws around meat farming would be very different
Clever. I wish I’d gotten a serious discussion out of this, but that’s the community.
But his comment is relevant the toppic.
Modern industrial famring utilizes forced insemination with a tool operated by a human.
A reasonable person could argue that it's not sexual assault becuase the act was not for sextial gratification, but purely utilitarian in order to obtain a baby cow, disregarding the welfare of the cow.
In other words, whether an act is sexual assault or not depends on the intentions of the actor, regardless of the experience of the subject and physical nature of the act.
If you fill in "human" as your subject in the above formula, a reasonable person could conclude that the experience of the subject does, infact, matter.
You got it. This is why I went vegan for years.
I’m aware. I’m a vegan because I’m not down for animal rape. The bestiality laws are written with exceptions for people who are acting, not out of their own sexual interest, but out of financial interest.
I wanted to have a slightly different discussion, because this one’s depressing as shit though.
A serious discussion about the ethics of bestiality? If that's the kind of place you're looking for I think you might have to create it yourself.
I don’t think I have the moderating skills, lol.
Honestly it would be really interesting to read that discussion, if it stayed objective and not divert to memeing. You can argue bestiality shouldn't be forbidden by specific laws (but animal welfare laws) since if we make laws based on what we find gross, that's how we get bans on homosexuality for example. Also you could argue that animals can actually consent in some ways, since if a male dog is willing to hump anything, isn't that consenting? But then on the other hand in comparison if a person of limited mental capacity is willing to fuck anything, is fucking them ethical?
Anyway, after writing that I find it important to point out that I'm personally aromantic asexual and absolutely do not want to fuck anything lmao. Though maybe that also has something to do with how I can look at these concepts from a distance, since they have nothing to do with me
The keyword is informed consent, which requires full understanding of the situation. Children, animals, and impaired people can't give informed consent.
Now I'm trying to figure out what dirty joke I accidentally made
Just a little tender tenderizing.
Exactly. Can a man not beat his meat in the privacy of a road shoulder anymore? What is this world coming to?
I'm going to create my own Kentucky, with blackjack and hookers!