this post was submitted on 18 Feb 2026
272 points (98.6% liked)

People Twitter

9590 readers
694 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kurcatovium@piefed.social 16 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (4 children)

I've seen mentioned these:

  • Stoat - pretty much same UI, based in UK, not sure where they get $$
  • Fluxer - looks virtually like 1:1 Discord clone, based in Sweden, has paid tier pretty much like Nitro on Discord on official server
  • Nerimity - a little different UI, but still very Discord-y, based in UK, sourced from donations
  • Movim - this one is interesting, but it's not really Discord style app; it looks more like cross breed between IM and social network (FB/X), origin in France
  • Strafe - looks like Discord, supposedly have e2ee
  • Spacebar - reverse engineered Discord, IDK about maturity of this one
  • Adapt - another wanna be
[–] AlfalFaFail@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 hours ago

Saw this a few days ago.

[–] stom@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Stoat still doesn't have screenshare. It's also a bloody stupid name - I have no idea who thought that re-brand was a good idea.

Fluxer seems to support it though.

BNoth can be self-hosted, which is a nice bonus.

[–] kurcatovium@piefed.social 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Do people really use screen share that much? (Sadly) I use discord to reach a lot of my friends for multiple years and we actually used screen share maybe twice? Three times?

[–] fubbernuckin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 5 hours ago

I have used it multiple times every day this week.

[–] moopet@sh.itjust.works 9 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

Why is "one-to-one clone of Discord" the goal for everyone? Why not set your sights on a making a good UX instead?

[–] kurcatovium@piefed.social 2 points 5 hours ago

Well, Discord's UI is certainly not the holy grail, but it's quite functional and people are used to it. So it's pretty much logical you copy the concept to some extent when you want to appeal to these people?

[–] CheesyFox@lemmy.sdf.org 13 points 16 hours ago

ngl, discord kinda had the best UX before the enshittification began

[–] AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net 3 points 11 hours ago

I don't think it's necessarily the goal — Discord is just a helpful yardstick to compare things to as a baseline (and some people are looking for something that replaces Discord as closely as possible). Having to switch services is a pain, and whilst it's not optimal in the long term to just try to replace a thing with a clone, I can see why people don't have the executive function energy to think too hard about this.

[–] QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works 2 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

So you're saying there are options.

Doesn't Stoat charge far out the ass?

[–] kurcatovium@piefed.social 2 points 5 hours ago

There are actually many, many options. It's hard to guess which one will get the momentum and lift off though. You probably don't want to convince all your friends to switch to another platform just to see it die in half a year...