this post was submitted on 15 Feb 2026
62 points (98.4% liked)

Ask Lemmy

37812 readers
1815 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

My personal sign is when you start seeing awkward collaborations start cropping up. One time when I was thrifting, I picked up a graphic novel that had the Justice League, team with the Power Rangers of all things. I glimpsed into what the plot was about out of morbid curiosity and it was just a plain generic time and dimension thing.

Nothing ever connected between the teams at all. DC Comics, while fledgling at times with how they go about their series and movies, still have far more relevance than Power Rangers do. I think the Power Rangers are just grasping at straws to keep being relevant when people have largely moved on from them.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cosmOS@piefed.social 3 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

It seems like you’re both saying the same thing! The other person might have been suggesting that women’s voices tend to change less dramatically than men’s as they age. And hey, Bart Simpson is voiced by a woman!

[–] setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world 2 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

That's why I specifically mentioned Bart. Bart sounds absolutely terrible now.

I'm well aware adult women are often cast to play boy children. That has less to do with longevity compared to casting men as it does their ability to better mimic the higher pitch of children. Over a significant time period though, the voice talent ages no matter the gender.

[–] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 4 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

By the powers of pedantry, I have been summoned!

That has less to do with longevity compared to casting men as it does their ability to better mimic the higher pitch of children.

What the heck are you talking about?
they were saying "that's why child characters get voiced by women instead of men", they said "that's why child characters get voiced by women instead of children"
Because that choice absolutely does have to do with the longevity of the voice.

That's a wild way to misunderstand them lol.

[–] setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

women’s voices tend to change less dramatically than men’s as they age.

Point to the child actor being discussed in this sentence.

[–] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Not cosmOS, Crunchy. The person who said "that's why young boys are voiced by women" to which you replied "that's not really what I'm talking about"

I could have replied directly to that but I didn't wanna fork the thread, since it's more or less the same convo. Although in hindsight I should have.

But generally I feel like y'all are talking past each other

[–] setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

That’s why young boys are usually voiced by women

Not a word in there about children doing the voices. If they wanted to clarify a supposed ambiguity, they could have done it themselves.

You coming in and very confidently declaring exactly what they meant despite nobody talking about children doing children's voices, and giving your "correction" it in a condescending way:

What the heck are you talking about?

That’s a wild way to misunderstand them lol.

That makes you the asshole. Be gone.

[–] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 0 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Hey, I'm coming in and matching your energy.

They didn't specifically mention children or adult men, for you to assume they meant adult men is a crazy assumption to make.

[–] setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

Then they can clarify it for themselves. Talking about actors working in voice acting industry, in TV production, means adults more often than children doing the work. Not always, but adults are more common than children. It is a reasonable assumption, and if it is wrong, again- the poster can clarify it on their own.

Hey, I’m coming in and matching your energy.

I was being civil and didn't insult anyone's opinion or "lol" at what they were saying until you showed up doing just that. We can look at the thread and see exactly where I started having bad energy and it was after you came in acting like an ass. So in actual fact, I'm matching your energy as it is exceedingly rare for me to insult other users, in fact it might be a first for me here, but you managed to be special.

crazy assumption to make

Fuck off. Seriously. You're just coming in and making an opposite assumption based on the exact same vague statement and acting smug about it.

[–] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 1 points 20 hours ago

Lol yeah for sure, none of that is preachy. You're totally reading your own words in a totally unbiased way