this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2026
38 points (79.7% liked)

Showerthoughts

40428 readers
887 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Maybe this is a regional thing but I've always called it the US

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I refer to it as "the US", but refer to myself as an "American."

[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

I'm a US citizen and lived there most of my life but refuse to call myself American. I'd rather call myself after my home state or country of birth, but saying you're from the US is an embarrassment. That country never did anything for me anyways, I spent my life fighting against it

I no longer live in the US

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.social 2 points 22 hours ago

Sir (or madam), they are not a "sir."

[–] NarrativeBear@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

To add to the confusion. The Americas (or America) comprise the landmasses of North and South America in the Western Hemisphere

People living in North and South America (or the Americas) can also be called American or Americans if the were referring to the landmass.

Strangely the United States IMO is the only country that seems to indicate the landmass its situated on when using the full name, the United States of America. Not to mention the indication of a union of individual states as well.

Several single-word English demonym alternatives have been suggested over time, for example Columbian, Columbard, Fredonian, Frede, Unisian, United Statesian, Colonican, Appalacian, Usian, Washingtonian, Usonian, Uessian, U-S-ian, Uesican, and United Stater.

Saying someone is a United Statesian or Statesian is probably the closest to how other countries like Canada (Canadian) or Mexico (Mexican) refer to themselves. If we forget that pretty much all other countries are a unity of states, counties, and or provinces.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demonyms_for_the_United_States

Call us Yankees because it'll annoy the "the South will rise again" crowd

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Thats's cuz English Language sucks.

In Chinese Language for example: A 美人 (American (Country)) and a 美人 (American (Continent)). But in English both are "American".

Also so many syllabels converying so few info.

Literally 4 syllabels for "American"

But "美國人" or "美洲人" are both 3 syllabels and already contains [America-Country Person] or [America-Continent Person]

Sorry, no offense to English speakers, but as a polyglot, I just had to comment this xD

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago

All languages convey information at roughly similar rates. Those with less information per syllable tend to say more syllables per minute. It's a fascinating area of linguistics!

All natural languages have ambiguities where the meaning of a word depends on context due to changes over time.

[–] not_woody_shaw@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] WildPalmTree@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

At this point, I think we should just call US people Indian.

[–] WildPalmTree@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

You do know it is actually named "the United Mexican States", right? The name of the US is simply bad from the beginning and sometimes you can't fix bad. Unless they take over all of the Americas, I guess. Then it's a good name. Bad move, but good name.

[–] ParadoxSeahorse@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

That’s wild what a plot twist

[–] NarrativeBear@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I do, most countries are a unitity of states, counties, or provinces.

It would be so confusing if Mexico never settled on a name for its united states and called themselves the United States of America

[–] WildPalmTree@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago

"Saying someone is a United Statesian or Statesian is probably the closest to how other countries like Canada (Canadian) or Mexico (Mexican) refer to themselves. If we forget that pretty much all other countries are a unity of states, counties, and or provinces. "

I was refering to this part of your post. United Statesian or Statesian doesn't make sense to correlate to Mexicans. They are both united states. As for Canada, I think they might be a confederacy and thus united states as well, but I also believe their semi-official name is actually Canada.

As for most countries being united of sorts, I'm willing to accept that as an axiom, but I'm doubtful it is part of their cultural identity in the majority of cases. Maybe on a per capita basis.

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Several single-word English alternatives have been suggested

Some of these make sense, but several of them would only refer to a specific area in the U.S. (e.g. Washingtonian) or are really out of left field (e.g. Fredonian).

[–] WildPalmTree@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm assuming Washingtonian would be refering to the man, not the state that refers to the man. I mean, it's a silly name, but not for the reason you state.

Residents of Washington DC are also referred to as Washingtonians