WildPalmTree

joined 2 years ago
[–] WildPalmTree@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago (4 children)

Conventions. That's what kept the US somewhat sane, until it didn't. How is that going again?

[–] WildPalmTree@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Broken finger. Brilliant!

[–] WildPalmTree@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

And that is my point! Or half of it, I should say. I've made too many comments in this thread to keep track of myself. Contextually it works, but that doesn't make it more suitable than American as that works equally well. No one that isn't trying to be obtuse will think you mean Mexican when you say American, even though it is technically as correct.

[–] WildPalmTree@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

It was a retorical question. :)

[–] WildPalmTree@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Agreed. And correct. We are not disagreeing. :)

[–] WildPalmTree@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

"Saying someone is a United Statesian or Statesian is probably the closest to how other countries like Canada (Canadian) or Mexico (Mexican) refer to themselves. If we forget that pretty much all other countries are a unity of states, counties, and or provinces. "

I was refering to this part of your post. United Statesian or Statesian doesn't make sense to correlate to Mexicans. They are both united states. As for Canada, I think they might be a confederacy and thus united states as well, but I also believe their semi-official name is actually Canada.

As for most countries being united of sorts, I'm willing to accept that as an axiom, but I'm doubtful it is part of their cultural identity in the majority of cases. Maybe on a per capita basis.

[–] WildPalmTree@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

At this point, I think we should just call US people Indian.

[–] WildPalmTree@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (5 children)

They will. They will also know if you say you are from America. My point was that one is no better than the other, from an accuracy point of view. Both have multiple meanings.

[–] WildPalmTree@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm assuming Washingtonian would be refering to the man, not the state that refers to the man. I mean, it's a silly name, but not for the reason you state.

[–] WildPalmTree@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (3 children)

You do know it is actually named "the United Mexican States", right? The name of the US is simply bad from the beginning and sometimes you can't fix bad. Unless they take over all of the Americas, I guess. Then it's a good name. Bad move, but good name.

[–] WildPalmTree@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (9 children)

But not more States, united or not...?

[–] WildPalmTree@lemmy.world -1 points 4 weeks ago

I just find it sad this is actually logged. Uninstalls, that is.

view more: next ›