this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2026
142 points (100.0% liked)

Chapotraphouse

14266 readers
520 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Always had a suspicion, but its nice to know that you can just generally assume the worst about a technology these days.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] blobjim@hexbear.net 32 points 3 days ago (2 children)

It's such a ridiculously flawed concept to have remote operators. It seems like a way to make the work look better to "investors".

We already saw Waymos all stopping when the power went out in San Francisco recently (https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c36zdxl41jro). It has no resiliency in the case of any kind of failure whatsoever.

It's a bad idea to build anything on top of a foundation of things that can be disrupted so quickly. Like power, GPS, cell service and other radio communication. Data centers seem like another big failure point, although I think they still make a lot of sense to have.

But making your service rely on near-real-time internet access to another country is a whole other level of single point of failure. It's hard enough to make a one-way video feed real-time.

This obviously isn't a model for replacing all road vehicles with "driverless" ones. It will never happen. You can't remotely operate a 1 ton metal object moving at 20-80 mph.

[–] MeetMeAtTheMovies@hexbear.net 16 points 2 days ago

We already saw Waymos all stopping when the power went out in San Francisco recently

People act like AI in its current form was inevitable but this reliance on centralized computation centers is one of the ways it was shaped by capital specifically.

[–] jackmaoist@hexbear.net 11 points 2 days ago

It's just another way to outsource work to slave labor in foreign countries. Basically the peak of capitalist innovation.