this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2026
80 points (97.6% liked)

Ask Lemmy

37485 readers
1343 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Edit to add my opinion so I'm not just replying "I agree" to 90% of comments. I think it should be legal, properly regulated, taxed and viewed as a profession. I haven't personally engaged in it but I have no moral objection to it. I do hate the common sentiment that it was the individual's "only option" though.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Chippys_mittens@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Would nobody have to work under other forms of governmental organization?

[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

*economic organization

But the idea is that, under capitalism you have to work in order to survive. Under a different system you work to benefit society, by your survival is otherwise assured.

Really depends on how it's organized of course. Hard to say now since there is such a death grip on keeping capitalism for some reason.

[–] Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Humans have a natural drive to work for the betterment of their community. Capitalism suppresses that drive by teaching them to sell their bodies and time. Give them a choice, and enough will choose to work that society can survive. Those who don't want to work are often sick in some way and need society's support. There's no such thing as laziness.

[–] Chippys_mittens@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I promise I've worked with horrifically lazy people, proud of their lack of work ethic. I'm glad you have that much faith in the populace. In my experience, I think a large chunk of people would abuse a trust based system.

[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Have You ever wondered why they act that way? It may not just be as you assume, that they're terrible people, but instead that all empathy and sense of community has been ground out of them by a system that punishes you for thinking of others.

[–] Chippys_mittens@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Thats a pretty idealistic thought. You're lucky to have never met a lazy person or been forced to pick up their slack.

[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Is it? Or is it pragmatic rather than pessimistic?

People dont just neatly fit into boxes, to be dismissed as having singular motivation that is all completely surface level. Every single person you meet and deal with will have a complex and unique history that defines them as a person, just like you. And just like you, they may dismiss you as just some simple-minded fool who does things for obvious reasons.

[–] Chippys_mittens@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I think you need to interact with more people and learn what pragmatic means.

[–] Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Then it's a good thing I'm an antirealist. We shouldn't be pressuring others to believe in reality, it just reinforces bigotry and oppression.

[–] Chippys_mittens@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Hell yeah sibling.