Chapotraphouse

14263 readers

705 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

LENINSGHOSTFACEKILLA@hexbear.net

corgiwithalaptop@hexbear.net

a_little_red_rat@hexbear.net

khizuo@hexbear.net

thelastaxolotl@hexbear.net

CoolerOpposide@hexbear.net

We need a followup to Idiocracy (lemmy.ml)

submitted 3 days ago by anotherspinelessdem@lemmy.ml to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net

34 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Turns out, it was just the USA. Almost everyone else is communist and in space with satellites pointed at the US and laughing. They originally couldn't do anything to fix the States because of the nukes and nuclear capitalism just kept rewarding the most inbred failsons in an endless cycle like the royal families, but they disabled the nukes decades ago and isolated the States, leaving a constant horrific reminder of the inevitable results of capitalism (amid a longstanding debate about socialist self-determination).

The rise of president Notsure then gave them a sociological experiment and data too good to pass up, and the field of Sociology is having a resurgence it hasn't had in years.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] BelieveRevolt@hexbear.net 11 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

”Stupid people shouldn't breed/should breed less” is basically the definition of eugenics.

[–] fort_burp@feddit.nl 1 points 3 days ago (3 children)

No, it's not. Eugenics is using selective breeding and/or forced sterilization to produce a human population with specific traits.

[–] volcel_olive_oil@hexbear.net 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Idiocracy essentially makes the argument that we should use selective breeding and/or forced sterilization to produce a human population with specific (liberal intelligentsia) traits

[–] fort_burp@feddit.nl 1 points 2 days ago

Really? That must have gone totally over my head. Huh. Well, it's been 20 years lol. I don't remember there being any policy suggestions in the movie.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 days ago

Eugenics is the policy proscription for dysgenics, which is what Idiocracy is about.

[–] LENINSGHOSTFACEKILLA@hexbear.net 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yes, and in the movie "smart" is a specific trait that is only influenced by your parents. It might not be arguing for a eugenics program, but it is saying that underlying idea of eugenics is correct, when it is not.

[–] fort_burp@feddit.nl 2 points 2 days ago

only influenced by your parents

Huh? I didn't get that from the movie. There was also the cultural aspect of anti-intellectualism where people displaying any hint of intelligence are abused, physically and/or verbally, which cultivates further anti-intellectualism. Also in the intro scene the 2 groups juxtaposed were one that live in a trailer park (symbolizing the poors) and one that live in a mansion (symbolizing the wealthy). The movie takes place in the US so we know access is drawn exactly along those lines. I saw it as more of a materialistic framing, and backed by the well established relationship between education and birth rate, but I guess that's art, right? People walk away with different ideas after seeing the same thing.