Chapotraphouse

14256 readers

659 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

LENINSGHOSTFACEKILLA@hexbear.net

corgiwithalaptop@hexbear.net

a_little_red_rat@hexbear.net

khizuo@hexbear.net

thelastaxolotl@hexbear.net

CoolerOpposide@hexbear.net

concept of crimes against humanity trials (hexbear.net)

submitted 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) by hellinkilla@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net

48 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I am watching a BBC doc about the Nuremberg trials. It is overall propagandizing against the concept of trying crimes against humanity at all. Due to, as described, the british position: it'll just be another chance for the defendants to present their position to the world so better to hang them and be done with it.

Q: Agree/disagree with the above? Both in the specific instance, and in general.

It was the first, but not the last, such proceeding. What are we learning from subsequent?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Andrzej3K@hexbear.net 17 points 4 days ago (1 children)

You have to bring them to justice, and you have to do that with due process. Fidel understood the importance of this.

[–] Keld@hexbear.net 13 points 3 days ago

Stalin was big on trials because of the importance of cementing a specific thing as wrong. It is not merely that the perpetrators needed to be punished, it was equally as important that everyone else understand what they had done and why it was wrong.

Now the problem with that is that the Nuremburg trials were a fucking sham and most of these assholes got off.