this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2026
802 points (98.9% liked)

Microblog Memes

10199 readers
3805 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] titanicx@lemmy.zip 57 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

I hate that OP blacked out the company. Name and shame these fucks.

[–] David_Eight@lemmy.world 22 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I feel like people block out names way to often now. I they felt comfortable enough to send this email, I'm sure they'd feel comfortable with it being shared with others, right?

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Well they should be, but they could get litigious if they get bad exposure.

[–] frog_brawler@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Litigious how? It's not libel, slander, or defamation since it actually happened.

[–] Bgugi@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

Reality is irrelevant in a court of law.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 14 points 13 hours ago (3 children)

It'd just discourage companies from sending rejection letters or giving reasons.

Better to flame the situation than the company in this case.

[–] douglasg14b@lemmy.world 15 points 11 hours ago

Ah yes the: "Accountability is bad because then those held accountable will try and hide their actions" argument.

It's not an ideal position to hold as it's one that's subservient to abuse and malicious intent

[–] slappyfuck@lemmy.ca 3 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Another thing that needs to be legally mandated. Not only should it be mandated to discuss pay, responsibilities, culture, etc. during the interview process, it needs to be mandated that you receive a fully human written rejection letter explaining in specific detail why they did not select you.

[–] awfulawful@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

This sounds great in theory, but I can assure you it will just result in either boilerplate or ai generated explanations. The work of putting that together is just going to get thrust on already overworked people who are dragged into panel interviews so managers don't have to deal with it.

[–] slappyfuck@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 hour ago

That’s why you mandate that it not be boilerplate and AI—but you’re right that it could get tricky. As another person said, ultimately we need a federal and state jobs program.

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 5 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

If the USA is remade, I think that all jobs should go through a state and federally controlled job board. The government's job should be to ensure the things you outlined, and other stuff to help employees be safeguarded from corporate abuse.

[–] slappyfuck@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 hour ago

Yep. I am 100% in favor of a federal and state coordinated job placement service. Corporations have demonstrated that they are incapable of properly hiring people.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 5 points 11 hours ago

For future reference, they can just omit the middle paragraph because nobody cares about the opinion of a company that isn't hiring them.