this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2026
128 points (95.1% liked)
Videos
17381 readers
649 users here now
For sharing interesting videos from around the Web!
Rules
- Videos only (aside from meta posts flagged with [META])
- Follow the global Mastodon.World rules and the Lemmy.World TOS while posting and commenting.
- Don't be a jerk
- No advertising
- No political videos, post those to !politicalvideos@lemmy.world instead.
- Avoid clickbait titles. (Tip: Use dearrow)
- Link directly to the video source and not for example an embedded video in an article or tracked sharing link.
- Duplicate posts may be removed
- AI generated content must be tagged with "[AI] …" ^Discussion^
Note: bans may apply to both !videos@lemmy.world and !politicalvideos@lemmy.world
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Actually... celebrity worship of this type is why America is in the hole it is in.
I have no doubt Jon Stewart is a thousand times better than the Orange Pedo but that is true for 98% of the population.
What kind of preparation would Jon Stewart have to be a good President of the USA? other than being famous?
Oddly, you'd be correct 99% of the time but in Jon's case he is actually highly experienced with dealings on Capitol Hill.
Kind of agree, but he has shown he's willing to fight for great causes despite his notoriety, he tends to speak truth to power, and he already knows what it means to be famous, so I guess it's better than a lot of alternatives.
And he has the charisma and speaking ability to actually win
In this specific case it's not just blind celebrity worship, he has solid experience pressuring legislators into doing the right things like with helping 9/11 firefighters, he's generally on the correct side of most issues that affect the working class, and is a very good rhetorician (acknowledging that his show has other writers as well) to give speeches and communicate to the populace.
But the great thing about being President is that your allowed staff. Bring the daily show writing crew as your staff writers!
He has his hands on the pulse of the collective conscience, he's used to keeping up on current events and really understanding the common sentiments associated with them, has experience managing a team of support staff, has great people skills, genuine good will, and an intention to have a positive influence on society.
Honestly, what more does a president need? They can appoint relevant experts for their cabinet picks, they don't really need to have any expertise or political experience themselves as long as they have the qualities listed above.
Reagan and Trump have proven that actors and media personalities are extraordinarily good at pushing their agendas. The problem isn't that they were/are celebrities. The problem is that their agendas suck.
Stewart has consistently demonstrated his agenda, on the air and as a lobbyist. His agenda doesn't suck. His agenda is what this country has been looking for my entire lifetime.
Don't cockblock my candidate.
so maybe, just maybe, go with someone that has an actual education and career to show they have a good agenda? not just someone that seems nice... I do not think he has done bad things but he has barely been successful at ONE thing he has pushed the gov for (and not that successful because Vets keep getting defunded)
Dude you’re not winning this point. We understand what you’re saying and we disagree.
Stewart / Sanders 28!
I'm fairly certain the person you're arguing with is a plant. He's probably a covert right-winger here to sow discord on the left.
I refuse to believe the average leftist is as mentally handicapped as it would seem from merely reading comments on internet forums.
The widespread compulsive self-sabotage on the left makes no sense otherwise.
lol, tell me it's not celebrity worship while performing celebrity worship
Uh, my argument was the reverse: That it is celebrity worship, and that celebrities have proven substantially more effective presidents. Reagan and Trump have easily been the most influential presidents since Truman, and only because Truman used the bomb.
My point was that the problem with celebrities in the White House has been their right-wing agendas, not their celebrity status. Their celebrity status enabled them to achieve their agendas in a way that the other, mediocre presidents couldn't.
Why should we select yet another boring, ignoreable, mainstream, career politician instead?
He has shown that he has the very necessary ability to say, "I don't know." And him being famous for what he does has put him in the unique position to follow it up with, "But I know some people who might..."
He has also demonstrated the very essential ability to listen when the smart people (and Doris Kearns-Goodwin) are talking.
Do I think he would be a good president? No. He's very much a liberal capitalist that worships the status quo we had under Clinton.
It's just that he demonstrates the qualities of a good leader that people are searching for in these demon days.
So he should be aligned in the complete opposite direction of the country and the world. Ok. You think he can turn it all around in 4 years with a divided house?
Oh snap
That's actually exactly what he's saying. He just can't say it directly because it would impact his popularity.
https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/62154821/23927704
Well, it's worked out phenomenally for Ukraine....
Actually, it isn't. Sure, Trump is from reality TV but without the four decades of neoliberal rot hollowing out the country people aren't desperate enough to think this fool can fix everything alone.
Trump's popularity is a product of decades of austerity, lax antitrust enforcement, and reverse welfare.
Jesus man you're clueless.