this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2026
66 points (90.2% liked)

Ye Power Trippin' Bastards

1702 readers
14 users here now

This is a community in the spirit of "Am I The Asshole" where people can post their own bans from lemmy or reddit or whatever and get some feedback from others whether the ban was justified or not.

Sometimes one just wants to be able to challenge the arguments some mod made and this could be the place for that.


Posting Guidelines

All posts should follow this basic structure:

  1. Which mods/admins were being Power Tripping Bastards?
  2. What sanction did they impose (e.g. community ban, instance ban, removed comment)?
  3. Provide a screenshot of the relevant modlog entry (don’t de-obfuscate mod names).
  4. Provide a screenshot and explanation of the cause of the sanction (e.g. the post/comment that was removed, or got you banned).
  5. Explain why you think its unfair and how you would like the situation to be remedied.

Rules


Expect to receive feedback about your posts, they might even be negative.

Make sure you follow this instance's code of conduct. In other words we won't allow bellyaching about being sanctioned for hate speech or bigotry.

YPTB matrix channel: For real-time discussions about bastards or to appeal mod actions in YPTB itself.


Some acronyms you might see.


Relevant comms

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

@geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml banned me from !ManufacturingConsent@lemmy.ml (permanently!) and removed my comment from the post, because I dared to note that there are protests in Iran and shared a link to a crimethinc article with voices from within Iran. They call it "imperialist propaganda" if leftist voices from within Iran are distributed.

My comment:

I get it that the western media narrative is incredibly one-sided, focused on ideological bogeymen and focused on getting the monarch back in power. But I'd like to point out that there is in fact quite massive repression going on against the protestors. Leftist orgs in Iran need international solidarity now.

Their "reasoning":

reason: Ignoring the post to spam imperialist propaganda

I don't think that person can be reasoned with if they call crimethinc imperialist propaganda, so I'm not getting my hopes up for them lifting the ban.

I also think that they might be a bit butthurt, because I called out their zionistic worldview (i.e.: that judaism equates zionism) a few days ago.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

YDI. Iran is being threatened with imperial violence more than ever. Now is not the time to be promoting imperial propaganda. Nobody cares about your "but akshualllyyy". Save it for the libs who completely support zionism, colonialism, etc. If the imperial "revolution" succeeds, the leftist groups that you supposedly support will be the first to be attacked.

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 17 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Show me where I "promot[ed] imperial propaganda". Did you read the article which clearly condemns the imperialist actors?

Edit: also, the comm actually doesn't have any rules and the instance rules shouldn't apply, either, afaik.

[–] Riverside@reddthat.com 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You promote imperial propaganda by giving voice to opposition one week before a US invasion of a country. The only reason why you happen to care about Iranian protestors is because of the constant western-manufactured atrocity propaganda, which doesn't need to be fake to serve its purpose of defeatism and of making opposition to armed invasion of Iran less unpalatable among progressives. It's the same tactic of western media overfocusing on Hamas violence in Palestine during a period of literal genocide by Israel.

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You promote imperial propaganda by giving voice to opposition

What? How is citing lefitist protestors "imperialist propaganda"? Spare me your campist drivel.

The only reason why you happen to care about Iranian protestors is because of the constant western-manufactured atrocity propaganda

That's a lot of assumptions you make about strangers on the internet, homie.

[–] Riverside@reddthat.com -1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

You ignored the second half of my comment, could you respond to that part? I'm not questioning that you have good intentions, I know you do, that's not my point. I just want you to understand that directing the conversation towards where you're directing it right before a military attack on Iran creates an easier atmosphere for the Empire to defend its invasion. It's almost the definition of atrocity propaganda:

"Atrocity propaganda is the spreading of information about the crimes committed by an enemy, which can be factual, but often includes or features deliberate fabrications or exaggerations. This can involve photographs, videos, illustrations, interviews, and other forms of information presentation or reporting".

With good intentions, undoubtedly, you're presenting information on the repression of progressives in Iran, which is a bad thing which is happening, but doing so right before the invasion amounts to atrocity propaganda by definition.

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

How does that apply to the crimethinc article?

Edit:
So, tell me if I got that right: You maynever criticize an enemy government of the US, or you'd be spreading "imperialist propaganda". No matter how valid the criticism is. Otherwise, you're enabling the US to invade.

... I didn't know the pentagon listened to randos on lemmy. /s

[–] Riverside@reddthat.com -2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You maynever criticize an enemy government of the US

The word "never" is the key point here. You may very well criticize the Iranian government and defend the progressives in the country, but I would bet 100€ that if we go 1 year back on any of your social media, you have never made this criticism before. Why now particularly, during the military buildup by the US before the imminent attack on Iran? Why specifically Iran too? Clue: it's because the imperial propaganda apparatus has decided that discussing the repression in Iran right now is the agenda, as part of a larger atrocity propaganda campaign.

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

but I would bet 100€ that if we go 1 year back on any of your social media, you have never made this criticism before

You'd lose that bet. as I said: that's a bunch of assumptions you just *make about strangers on the internet.

Why now particularly,

Because there are protests in Iran right now. Read the fucking article, if you want to know "why now". It wasn't because I thought "hmm, the US could use another invasion right now.

Clue: it's because the imperial propaganda apparatus has decided that discussing the repression in Iran right now is the agenda, as part of a larger atrocity propaganda campaign.

Yeah, it's definetly not because of the protests in Iran. Those are completely not happening. /s

[–] Riverside@reddthat.com -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You linked a wikipedia article, did you write it yourself?

Because there are protests in Iran right now

And why exactly are those protests happening now, I wonder? Maybe because the US+EU imposed a sanction regime on Iran that has destroyed the national currency's exchange value and massively impoverished the vast majority of the population? I'm sure that's also coincidental and has nothing to do with attempts at regime change in the country. It's not like the US has ever explicitly said that it applies economic sanctions to create hunger, desperation and overthrow of governments. Oh, wait...

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You linked a wikipedia article, did you write it yourself?

You said that now is the first time I'd be interested in iranian protests. The article describes a time when I showed solidarity for iranian protest movements before.

Maybe because the US+EU imposed a sanction regime on Iran that has destroyed the national currency's exchange value and massively impoverished the vast majority of the population?

Yes. The article mentions (and condemns) this, as well. Read the fucking article, you troll.

[–] Riverside@reddthat.com 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The article describes a time when I showed solidarity

I talked about your social media activity, not about you thinking something to yourself.

Yes. The article mentions (and condemns) this, as well

That's irrelevant to my point. "Nuanced criticism" of the Iranian government the week before it's invaded is bad strategy for socialists in the west, there's already plenty of criticism in all media due to the anti-Iranian government atrocity propaganda. The entire thing circles down to you having good intentions by posting about progressives in Iran being repressed, but doing so during a period of extreme duress in the country which has been caused by the US+EU governments sanctions, and at a time when the country is about to be invaded by the US.

Your intentions are noble and commendable, and I respect them, but you're unintentionally carrying water for the US invasion by replicating atrocity propaganda at this particular moment.

[–] AzuranAurora@piefed.ca 4 points 2 weeks ago

Typical technocrit, always trying to stir the pot. Yawwwwwwn.