this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2026
47 points (88.5% liked)

Ye Power Trippin' Bastards

1678 readers
322 users here now

This is a community in the spirit of "Am I The Asshole" where people can post their own bans from lemmy or reddit or whatever and get some feedback from others whether the ban was justified or not.

Sometimes one just wants to be able to challenge the arguments some mod made and this could be the place for that.


Posting Guidelines

All posts should follow this basic structure:

  1. Which mods/admins were being Power Tripping Bastards?
  2. What sanction did they impose (e.g. community ban, instance ban, removed comment)?
  3. Provide a screenshot of the relevant modlog entry (don’t de-obfuscate mod names).
  4. Provide a screenshot and explanation of the cause of the sanction (e.g. the post/comment that was removed, or got you banned).
  5. Explain why you think its unfair and how you would like the situation to be remedied.

Rules


Expect to receive feedback about your posts, they might even be negative.

Make sure you follow this instance's code of conduct. In other words we won't allow bellyaching about being sanctioned for hate speech or bigotry.

YPTB matrix channel: For real-time discussions about bastards or to appeal mod actions in YPTB itself.


Some acronyms you might see.


Relevant comms

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

@geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml banned me from !ManufacturingConsent@lemmy.ml (permanently!) and removed my comment from the post, because I dared to note that there are protests in Iran and shared a link to a crimethinc article with voices from within Iran. They call it "imperialist propaganda" if leftist voices from within Iran are distributed.

My comment:

I get it that the western media narrative is incredibly one-sided, focused on ideological bogeymen and focused on getting the monarch back in power. But I'd like to point out that there is in fact quite massive repression going on against the protestors. Leftist orgs in Iran need international solidarity now.

Their "reasoning":

reason: Ignoring the post to spam imperialist propaganda

I don't think that person can be reasoned with if they call crimethinc imperialist propaganda, so I'm not getting my hopes up for them lifting the ban.

I also think that they might be a bit butthurt, because I called out their zionistic worldview (i.e.: that judaism equates zionism) a few days ago.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Eldritch@piefed.world 15 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

Seems solid ptb to me. But yes, I don't think there's much likelihood of getting it reversed. You made the cardinal sin of calling for leftist aid for the people of Iran against their murderous anti west government. Which by the transitive property of being anti west, means that the power structure of the government is the good guy and victim here.

I knew the moment our hypocritical dumbass opened his mouth certain groups would use it to delegitimize the protests. But this is a learning opportunity. To understand who your actual allies are, and who's just reactionarily anti west.

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 8 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (3 children)

Tankies if they existed back in 1917, probably: the Tsar isn’t perfect by any stretch, but he’s doing all he can to oppose and stop the imperialist Kaiser! The so called People’s Soviets and Lenin are just agents of the imperial enemy attempting to install their own puppet!

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 8 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I'm not sure where I got this info. But I think I readonce that even Kropotkin argued for fighting the Kaiser.

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 9 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

Oh I’m mocking modern campists, saying they’d probably support the establishment over a people’s revolution, if they were around back then. Probably should have made that more clear. And you’re right, Kropotkin was one of the signatories of the Manifesto of the Sixteen supporting the Entente.

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 7 points 17 hours ago

Yeah, I got that. Just wanted to share trivia. (:

[–] Hyperrealism@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

Here me out. Many of the 'tankies' on lemmy.ml, hexbear, and lemmygrad are not actually tankies. People use that insult far too much.

It's often giving them too much credit.

Here's an excerpt from a relevant article:

Walking along the thoroughfares of the Russian capital these days, it’s easy to feel as though you’ve gone “Back to the Future.” Like Marty McFly in the classic 1985 movie, visitors to Moscow might imagine they’ve traveled back in time to the Soviet past, ... Golden hammer-and-sickle emblems festoon the buildings on Red Square, and out at the old Exhibition of Economic Achievements—a grand, Disneyland-sized theme park extolling the accomplishments of the Soviet Union—the statues of workers and collective farmers are all polished up like new. ... Tatiana Desiatova, a straight-talking Communist with a reputation for bluntness, says there is a much simpler and more cynical explanation for all of it: “The oligarchs have built nothing but their own wealth, so now we see them cleaning up the old monuments, putting out the old Soviet symbols, singing the old songs, and celebrating some of the USSR’s achievements in an attempt to bolster their own flagging legitimacy.” ... The Russian state manipulates those positive sentiments linked to the past in order to raise its own profile at home and abroad, opportunistically cherry-picking from the Soviet record while still taking advantage of every chance to trash Lenin, Marxist ideology, and socialist economics. ... It all seems to prove Tatiana Desiatova right. Putin sits at the head of a clique that calls the shots on everything—from economics to politics to war. Neither the plastering of Moscow with Soviet symbols and red flags nor the renovation of socialist monuments can hide the reality that Russia is a capitalist state ruled by a class of parasitical oligarchs.

Many of the 'leftists' you encounter online fall for the bullshit, as long as it's anti-western. The esthetic is enough for them because they are invariably young, dumb, naive, immature and/or privileged. For them debating politics is a hobby, not a cry for help or a fight for survival. It's fashionable and often a phase. They are nothing more than cosplay communists, who pop a Lenin avatar in their profile, but have no grasp of history or Marxism-Leninism. They're justifiably critical of western capitalism, they watched a streamer, they watched some tiktoks, and have come to the conclusion that any regime that is anti-western is necessarily better. This results in them knowingly and unknowingly parrotting the propaganda of anti-communists, theocrats and outright fascists.

They aren't like the tankies who supported the Soviets for ideological reasons, who were often willing to overlook or in denial about what happened in Hungary or Tiananmen. My grandparents were like that, and I could understand why they had a hard time accepting that the USSR and China were less than perfect, they had pinned all their hopes on them, and were living in a pre-internet age where western media bias went largely uncontested, and western imperial crimes went unpunished.

Cosplay communists may lie (to themselves and others) that they are critical of authoritarian capitalist states that wrap themselves in the hammer and sickle, but still mindlessly regurgitate the narratives of these billionaire oligarch run states like the useful idiots they are. If you're genuinely left-wing, it can be comforting to think of these people as allies or make excuses for them, but it's important to realize that they are not. They aren't actual allies, just contrarian parrots.

To be clear, this comment does not apply to actual communists. Thank you for attending my lecture. There will be no time for questions.

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

The esthetic is enough for them because they are invariably young, dumb, naive, immature and/or privileged.

You're wrong on that. Many MLs are plenty reasonable and mature in general. They're just misguided. We're better than these paternalistic insults.

Also, you're constantly skirting uncomfortably close to ableist insults for this instance. You have to stop painting people you disagree as unintelligent. There's plenty of other ways to make your point.

[–] Hyperrealism@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 13 hours ago

We’re better than these paternalistic insults.

Condescending or patronizing. Paternalistic implies benevolent intent, not contempt.

:)

[–] Eldritch@piefed.world 6 points 17 hours ago

IKR? I'm Antiathoritarian and Anti-Vanguard Party. If the CCP decided to help overthrow Trump, I would accept their help. They would still be next, but I would accept their help.

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 6 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Let me preface with saying Iran is indeed an authoritarian regime that killed many opposition. But Iran is rightfully anti west . The US and British did a coup and put the the shah instead who killed many people and when Iranians took back control of their country and kicked out the western agents the west retaliated with sanctions .

If the west want to be liked it should stop supporting settler colonialism, it should stop being complicit with multiple conflicts and genocides around the world

[–] Eldritch@piefed.world 6 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Oh, I never implied otherwise, and I agree 100%. But that doesn't make the government good. It's possible to be anti west, but not repressive and slaughtering your citizens in the street.

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 0 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Did you read my first sentence?

[–] Eldritch@piefed.world 3 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Yes, did you read and understand both of mine?

I'd say most here are pretty up to date on the situation in Iran. Though thanks for the recap. To be frank, I don't care if anyone likes the west. I live here and I don't. Though thanks for the downvote. 🤟 If you're reading anything here and getting "please like the west" try again. The United States stole my family's homes and lands. The United States tortured, starved and persecuted my family. The United States death marched my family cross-continent. Dumped them off in an arid, strange land that they'd never been too before and left them to fend for themselves. Fuck the US historically and trump/Republicans/fascists contemporaneously. Yeah, there's lots of good reasons to dislike the west and other rigid unanswerable hierarchies of power.

But there's no excuse to turn against the people when they stand against one those hierarchies, and another hypocritically endorses them. If you do that you're no ally of the proletariat, just a reactionary and apologist. None of the many horrific things the west has done justifies or excuses what the ayatollah and his zealous security forces are doing. Full stop. Fuck each and every one of these power structures, east or west. I hope that clarifies the sentiment here.

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world -5 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Your first comment made it look like being anti west is objectively always bad due to lack of details as opposed to my comment where my first sentence is about Iran being an autocratic country with human right abuses yet you keep telling me what I already know as if I think Iran is not as what you described

[–] Eldritch@piefed.world 5 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

I'd suggests you should take a look again at context clues. I used the term re-actionarily anti-west. As in if the west likes cookies. Therefore I hate cookies. I don't know if English is not your primary language. I know I would definitely struggle on any secondary languages I know. And if that's the case, no shade against you. But I was pretty clear that it wasn't just about being anti-west.

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world -1 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

Iran is not re-actionarily anti-west. It always the west who start with escalations against Iran then wonder why Iran hate them back. Opposing Iranian authoritarian and bloody regime is justified complaining about Iran relation with the west is not. The west hide under the facade of human rights to target Iran to sanctions Iran for opposing the terrorist state of Israel and for their right to develop it's civilians nuclear program and it's defense program. Where are the sanctions on the state of Israel(not just one or two settlers and one or two ministers), where are the sanctions on the UAE for backing the RSF committing a genocide in Sudan, where are the sanctions on Saudi Arabia for the same exact human right abuses Iran does?

[–] Eldritch@piefed.world 5 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

SMH. That was with regards to the posts subject. Not Iran.

Look if you support the Iranian people, we are 100% in agreement. If you reject them because a hypocritical loudmouthed infantile head of state cheered them on because he thinks he might benefit. Then we'll never agree and should just disengage. Fuck the Sha, fuck the ayatollah. May the Iranian people be the determiners of their own fate.

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world -4 points 14 hours ago

Again my first sentence in my first reply it was pretty clear that I support the iranians people who want more freedom and better economy. It is still pretty important to mention that foreign western intervention and hypocrisy would result even more deaths even after the regime potentially fall

[–] Hyperrealism@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

It'll be interesting to see the narratives change, if the regime in Iran falls.

I'm not on twitter, but I was reading that a lot of Scottish pro-independence accounts suddenly went quiet, when Iran closed down the internet.

I assume they've also infiltrated leftist spaces.

[–] Eldritch@piefed.world 7 points 15 hours ago

Yes, that's happened with other groups and I would expect no difference here. I remember reading just a few weeks ago about some internet outage over in Europe taking out a large chunk of maga posters and influencers. It's an attack the United States famously used as well.