this post was submitted on 13 Jan 2026
135 points (100.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

8753 readers
309 users here now

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Giving the ICE a platform to cry about how they're "threatened" by the public for things the public has every right to be enraged over is peak manufacturing consent. Who gives a shit what they think or how they feel after they kidnap and murder people?

Imagine if a German newspaper published an article like this about the SS during the holocaust, just letting the fucking extermination camp commanders vent about how everyone hates them now. Oh wait, that probably happened.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca -5 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

you don't even know what journalism is. the crazy shit they are saying is fucking important to report. imagine if no one documented the atrocities of nazi germany because they didn't want to "platform Hitler". you are out of your fucking tree. oh i know what will solve this, we'll just DEPLATFORM THE US GOVERMENT, THAT'LL FUCKIN' WORK, that's a real thing we can totally do and which will have positive consequences

[–] aberrate_junior_beatnik@midwest.social 8 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

imagine if no one documented the atrocities of nazi germany

This article isn't documenting the atrocities of ICE, it's uncritically repeating what ICE is saying about the atrocities

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

It's not commentary though, it's reporting - they made a claim (Ice hated, agents terrified) and then the rest of the article are examples of ice doing and saying things that support that claim. They're not condemning it because that isn't their goal, the goal is to show evidence of ICE's response to being widely condemned and generally reviled for being violent tools of a fascist state.

(edit: sp)