this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2026
606 points (99.3% liked)

politics

27115 readers
3960 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Most Americans believe that it’s a “problem” that Republicans are transphobic.

A new YouGov poll asked Americans whether they thought that certain issues were a “problem” for either party. 44% said that transphobia was “a major problem” among Republicans, and another 24% said they thought it was “a minor problem.” Only 32% of respondents said it wasn’t a problem.

Transphobia was the second most likely issue to be labeled a problem by respondents, after “hostility toward immigrants.” “Tolerance of political violence,” “conspiracy thinking,” “white supremacy,” “homophobia,” and “fascism” followed closely behind.

Oddly, 40% of respondents said that “transgender ideology” was “a major problem” for Republicans, and another 20% said it was “a minor problem.” 41% said that they didn’t think it was a problem at all for Republicans.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] logicbomb@lemmy.world 89 points 1 day ago (6 children)

There just aren't that many trans people compared to how often conservatives make a big issue of them. And the number of times that a trans person has actually caused a tangible problem for other people in a way that is related to their being trans is even more rare. Not that it doesn't happen, but it might as well be a unicorn.

That's an easy way to tell for sure that they are using the issue as a distraction.

[–] bearboiblake@pawb.social 59 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

It's not really a distraction, IMO. The enforcement of gender norms is kind of essential for conservative ideology. The idea that someone can transgress or opt-out from the enforcement of their rules is anathema to them.

If people assigned female at birth can become male and vice-versa, then all of the biological essentialism they believe in, that women are one way and men another due to their inherent characteristics, is proven false. It's an important part of their ideology and without it a lot of other enforced heirarchies they care about inherently fall apart.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sadly, a lot of the left is really naive to just how fucking evil these kinds of people are.

They worked hard to craft the narrative around trans people as the new sub-human scourge trying to destroy our nation etc. It was deliberate from the start, they picked a group that has low representation and low population, whom average people don't understand or connect with.

You don't fix this kind of thing with education, outreach and lecturing. You fix this with regime change. All of the transphobic chuds and all of the terfs have the attention-spans and emotional consistency of toddlers, that's why they were vulnerable to the narrative to begin with. If we had new leadership who, no matter what ideology they represented, said "trans people ain't a big deal and we ain't going after them" you would see vast waves of people lose interest and start looking for the next target to hate and scapegoat.

[–] tonytins@pawb.social 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I dunno. Personally, I think both can be true. Project 2025, for example, was published in 2023 and went largely under the radar for months, likely making the rounds at CPAC. It wasn't until discovered a year later that the GOP was forced to go into damage control. It's obvious no one was supposed to know about it. So, yeah, all that transphobic hate they spew is no doubt genuine but it's probably hiding something more sinister as well.

[–] III@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

The sinister part is control. They discovered long ago that giving people something to hate can bind them. The people pushing this agenda could give a shit either way about the people they designate as the enemy. It's why they so easily jump from one to the next. As soon as the current boogeyman isn't boosting their numbers enough, move on to the next boogeyman. They did this for years while slowly degrading education until people were too stupid they were being handled. It's structured evil controlling the cultivated stupid.

Thank you for saying this. I've come to the same conclusion and try to spread the word here and elsewhere.

[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Not distraction, scapegoat. Fascism needs an "others" demographic to blame for citizens' hardships, and they have realized that it's more effective to have multiple of them so voters can cherry-pick whichever they feel more strongly about.

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago

Straight, cis men cause a hell of a lot more problems statistically than any trans person, yet we don't see Republicans calling for them to be banned.

[–] tonytins@pawb.social 6 points 1 day ago

That's a very good point.

[–] SuiXi3D@fedia.io 4 points 1 day ago

I’ve known three trans people in my lifetime. All FTM. All were wonderful men.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago

I mean, true, but, going by pornhub numbers from Republican areas... oh they see trans people all the time.