this post was submitted on 09 Jan 2026
622 points (99.2% liked)

politics

27115 readers
4123 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 31 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (6 children)

It’s so stupid. People like JD Vance are so stupid. They don’t even consider that they could spin this as a bad event, and the shithead should be prosecuted and that their ICE actions are valid. I don’t agree with ICE and I’m not defending them. But if ICE is valid, then it’s valid that they could fuck up too. It would help their cause to run things in a less toxic way.

But this is asking for nuance from this administration. They're a bunch of maladjusted sociopaths. And to reiterate: I’m not defending ICE.

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)

At this point they don’t care about looking good. They care about looking powerful. They want people to know they can do this and nothing happens. Look what Miller is saying. We can do whatever we want to other countries because we have the power to do so. Same with ICE here.

These people suck. And there’s 10s of millions in this country that support them. Midterms won’t save us. Only reprogramming them will.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 12 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

It would honestly make the administration look better if they said "this ICE agent went rogue and will be held accountable. ICE as a whole does not condone this", but instead, they're defending it and effectively telling us ICE will continue to kill innocent citizens with impunity. They're telling us this is what they're supposed to be doing

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 2 points 3 days ago

That would be terrible for their recruiting metrics.

[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 14 points 4 days ago (2 children)

It's one of a few weaknesses they have. The whole "stick to your guns" strong-and-tough-guy ideology makes it impossible to backtrack, quickly pivot, or even feign concern, to achieve a quick tactical victory. All that is tantamount to failure and admitting defeat. Instead, they have to either build a massive smokescreen, lie their pants off, or dig even deeper into an already cursed situation. Then there's tribalism, making it impossible to publicly throw their own goons under the bus. It's a stupid and weirdly consistent mindset (i.e. lawful evil), but when it comes to this cabal and their supporters, it's kind of their whole deal.

[–] howl2@lemmy.zip 4 points 4 days ago

Their cause and purpose is terror and psychological abuse. For that reason they are already on point for serving their cause.

[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

Worst part is, it's not a new thing. It's a topic of concern for a character in a book I'm writing - where a powerful figure knows she's wrong on some occasions, but the political atmosphere rewards her more for boasting her righteousness on those issues.

[–] OpenPassageways@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 days ago

Yeah but he knows that if they think they have to follow rules... Trump supporters that can barely read and write wouldn't sign up to be jack-booted thugs.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Nuance? I’m valid. If I accidentally walk into a bank demanding money, can you spin that?

ICE is valid, but are way outside the scope they have historically been used for, with a flood of barely trained new people, going where they’re not wanted, to terrorize the population on the flimsy excuse of immigrants. They somehow believe they’re above the law and their victims are beneath it. If your “nuance” is this entire mission is criminal, ok. But there’s no nuance saying you can go this far into depriving people of rights, then claim that executing them is an accident

[–] Deathray5@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 6 hours ago

Border and immigration enforcement has always been questionable from a theoretical and practical level

[–] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone 0 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

maladjusted sociopaths

This is how the rest of the world has seen the US for some time.

Edifying to finally see what they’ve been seeing isn’t it?

[–] Soulg@ani.social 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Can we get a single post without comments like this our lives are going poorly enough thank you

Who am I kidding ofcourse not you have to jerk yourselves off to our misfortune

[–] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone -1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

our lives are going bad enough

You had control of that. Others don’t have and they don’t have control of your military turning on them.

No, I don’t get off on US misfortune, but I’m tired of fuckall being done by voters year by year then pissing and moaning when people are threatened and killed.

[–] AnalogNotDigital@lemmy.wtf 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Dude there's a lot of evidence he literally stole the election, so the people here clearly didn't want this guy in office.

[–] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone 2 points 3 days ago

They either did or didn’t care enough not to vote. Not just this election either.

Tampering is a shitload harder to do when the turnout is something like 80 or 90 percent.

No excuses here.