chat

I'm going to give you two good ones, and then you can start paying attention, and find your own examples.

Rep. Ocasio-Cortez questions Michael Cohen

This was the Congressional testimony of Michael Cohen, who was about to go to prison, and wanted to tell all about Trump. Unfortunately, as usual, the Congressional panelists were far more interested in posturing and pontificating, and NONE were doing anything substantive. I was watching it at the time, and it was frustrating as a viewer, and it was obvious that Cohen was frustrated, too. He wanted to tell his story, but nobody was asking the right questions.

Then the newly minted Congresswoman from NYC, made her first appearance on the national stage. With remarkable confidence, AOC informed Cohen that she'd be moving quickly, and he agreed, and she dove in, firing question after question at him, which he answered in equally rapidfire responses.

By the time she was finished, the whole world knew a small slice of the financial crimes he had committed, and who knew about it. The answers to the questions that only she bothered to ask, formed the basis of the case that Leticia James later brought against Trump, and convicting him of 34 felonies. The entire thing leads back to AOC's FIRST appearance in front of Congress.

I suspected at the time, and still believe it, that she was set up to offer this line of inquiry, so the old guard could do what they do best, blather on about bullshit, while giving her the opportunity to start collecting scalps in her new position. It probably didn't hurt that she was a NYC congressional rep, talking to an NYC corrupt lawyer.

Now she is considered one of the absolute leaders of the New Guard, and the base loves and trusts her implicitly. Over and over, she has shown her enthusiastic willingness to go face-to-face with the MAGA Morons, and metaphorically spit in their faces, and she has inspired COUNTLESS America citizens to get involved in progressive politics, and even run for office themselves. Following her has been Frost, Slotkin, and many others. So tell me again how the new people are the same as the old ones.

And speaking of the old ones, here's another example that the Dem party seems to be on a different path:

A few months into MAGA 2.0, I saw an interview with Adam Schiff, who I generally respect, something I RARELY say about ANY politician. He's an old school Democratic weakling, but Trump seems to have inspired him to show some willingness to fight back (along with Raskin), so I want to encourage that inclination. Anyway, he was asked about the MAGA blitzkrieg of EOs and illegal actions and DOGE piracy, and he was very contrite in saying that they underestimated America 's willingness to handle "bold action," and MAGA clearly demonstrated that it was possible. It was clear that he had a change of heart about strategy.

More importantly, Schiff isn't going on one of those Sunday morning shows to spew his own personal opinion. He is there to speak for the party, and give the party's line, and clearly they understood that they had been too cautious, and were now paying the price.

The problem doesn't seem to be Congress as a whole. There are lots of people chomping at the bit to fight back, but they're all hostages to the insipid, feckless, useless, cowardly leadership of Jeffries and Schmuck Schumer. Those two are closet MAGAs, or might as well be. It is highly unlikely they'll survive the leadership vote after the freshman reps arrive after the Midterm Bloodbath.

And here's a bonus one: Mark Kelly, and all the other ex-military members who released those videos reminding the military to only obey lawful orders. That was an extraordinary moment, a strategy calculated to force the administration to endorse the breaking of military law. Now they are stupidly attacking Kelly personally, suddenly making him a front-runner for the Democratic Nomination in 2028.

How about another bonus:

There are lots of examples of Schmuck 's trademarked "Stern Letter" responses to MAGA criminality, but there are also lots of examples of legal opposition, such as the defiance of Leticia James and Jack Smith, and others. Boutique law firms have popped up all over DC, formed by lawyers and law firms that were fired by the administration for prosecuting MAGA crimes, and those new firms are focussing on and addressing the corruption and immigration crimes of the administration. While the Biden administration couldn't be bothered, these cases are getting to court, and they are successful most of the time.

There is a new progressive wing who are active and influential outside of the size of their representation on Congress, and their representation is likely to increase greatly in November, as will their power over the party. Current members are acknowledging that they needed to be more decisive the last time, and understand that the voters will reward, or punish, them depending on their behavior. And there are legal outfits dedicated to challenging everything this administration is doing, and winning.

That's a lot of difference between the lazy Biden administration, with his useless Republican Attorney General, and the angry, restless Congress that is growing steadily, fueled by the righteous indignation of their constituents. The only thing holding them back at this point are Jeffries, and especially Schumer. Those two losers have got to get out of the way, or they'll get stomped on, which they richly deserve.