It's obvious in the left one that the screens have a similar sort of layout but have clearly different images. The ones on the right look a lot more similar but I think you can still see differences in the shape on the left side of the screen.

[–] StarkWolf@hexbear.net 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

And you can see the same slight differences in the original image OP posted. I specifically posted images from older AI models to show that they've been able to do this for a long time. Your point is nonsense.

[–] purpleworm@hexbear.net 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The images in the OOP look like they just have different brightness to me.

[–] StarkWolf@hexbear.net 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Here are the bottom right of the first two screens, which are similar, but different, because AI is dogshit at making user interfaces. There are other minor differences as well, just like in the additional examples I gave. The entire point is that AI has this thing for repeating display screens throughout an image and the slight inaccuracies give it away.

But forget the screens. You are focused on one single detail and missing all the others. I've outlined many others in another comment in this thread. But just look at this one detail again:

Here you have:

The person on the left is sitting right up against the glass (look at his shoe).
He is playing on a desk that goes through the glass and into the next box. (The edge of the table is visible between boxes. Only the front legs of the table appear inside the box)
The person on the right is seated facing away from his own screen, facing the back of the screen of the person on the left.

None of this makes any sense because..... the image is AI.

[–] purpleworm@hexbear.net 2 points 3 weeks ago

I understand now. Thank you for patiently explaining it to me.