this post was submitted on 31 Dec 2025
88 points (95.8% liked)

Slop.

756 readers
629 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LeninWeave@hexbear.net 9 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Oh well why am I not surprised since condescension, bullying, and rage baiting is the modus operanti of this instance which is especially harmful towards NDs. And when hexbears mark someone as the enemy, all rules are off. Even saying that their behaviour is harmful to NDs causes them to close ranks and engage in disgusting levels of ableism.

Even you, coming here all random-like to say that I'm just doing rhetoric by pointing out how shitty hexbear is to NDs is fucking condescending, as of I cannot possibly be upset about it it's just "tokenizing". When you pile in guns blazing with bad faith and condescension, don't be surprised that you get some of that back.

To clarify, I accused you of tokenizing (which I subsequently edited to say weaponizing, which was more accurate to what I meant) because you vaguely brought up the general idea of complaints made by ND users on here in a way that I felt lacked context and misrepresented the actual complaints. Moreover, your comment seemed to me to imply that the ND users here were all cowering in fear of the other users. As a person who was an extremely active participant in recent discussions on here on the subject (which I think are what you were referring to with the vague comment about ND users expressing being "terrified"), I took exception to that.

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

See if you came in with a reasonable point like this, instead of all combative, we wouldn't have reached this point. And this immediate bad faith I always see, is why I have a massive problem with hexbears.

Also I did not imply anything and you should know better than to assume. I said what I said. What I've seen. And it's true. And it upset me. And it's an indication of the effect hexbear can have on people (especially NDs) and why in my opinion hexbear keeps getting defederated.

[–] LeninWeave@hexbear.net 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Also I did not imply anything and you should know better than to assume. I said what I said. What I've seen. And it's true. And it upset me. And it's an indication of the effect hexbear can have on people (especially NDs) and why in my opinion hexbear keeps getting defederated.

It's because most of their members behave like a toxic clique to the point that I've seen ND hexbears publicly express how terrified they are about misstepping and having the rest turn on them.

I think that might not be an implication that ND users are cowering in fear of other users on here so much as an outright statement of it as fact. As I said, I was an active participant in those recent discussions and I feel that your characterization misrepresents them and infantilizes ND users on here. My initial reply was harsh because I had a real emotional response to that.