this post was submitted on 31 Dec 2025
87 points (96.8% liked)

Slop.

753 readers
439 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] krolden@lemmy.ml 5 points 14 hours ago

Op on there has an ICQ icon avatar.

I wonder if they know ICQ was created by unit 8200

[–] BanMeFromPosting@hexbear.net 6 points 18 hours ago (1 children)
[–] tocopherol@hexbear.net 45 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

It really just comes off as 100% online-thought when I see anyone talking about tankies, I've never heard someone say it IRL. When I got more specific knowledge about socialism growing up I started calling myself an anarchist, and then when actually engaging in activity with leftists I found the MLs and 'tankies' ~~were more serious~~(revising this because the anarchists I've known irl are plenty serious and do good work like help feed people with impromptu kitchens etc) and had a more rigorous ideology that truly supported anti-imperialist action and groups. I think whatever type of leftist you are we need to start with dismantling the current state, so at this stage it just seems like a waste of energy to worry about whether the other leftsts are too left or not left enough, as long as they aren't libs.

Anyone calling out 'tankies' really needs to evaluate their positions and whether or not they are unconsciously parroting the imperialist's view of 'authoritarian socialists'.

[–] Damarcusart@hexbear.net 18 points 1 day ago

(revising this because the anarchists I've known irl are plenty serious and do good work like help feed people with impromptu kitchens etc)

Those Actually Existing Anarchists are also called "tankies" by anarkiddies, because it is authoritarian to make them feel bad about their lack of action in the real world.

[–] Jabril@hexbear.net 29 points 1 day ago (7 children)

I had a DSA member tell me to watch out for tankies irl. Many of them might know better than to say it out loud, but plenty of real organizers believe tankies exist and need to be purged

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] GeckoChamber@hexbear.net 74 points 1 day ago (1 children)

5/10 see me after next sectarianism class

[–] DerRedMax@hexbear.net 40 points 1 day ago

My wife and I saw you from across the room and thought you were an undialectical idealist.

[–] bdazman@hexbear.net 32 points 1 day ago (37 children)

I realized a while ago the only reason these kids constantly (try to) debunk On Authority is because it's the shortest piece on anarchism they can find by a reputable Marxist and they will be damned before they read anything longer than a few pages.

[–] Jabril@hexbear.net 29 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Unfortunately a lot of anarchists do read anarchist lit which just affirms all their positions but unlike materialist works, doesn't require any evidence for the reader to accept it. The vibes and validation is all they need to say "see I have read and what I read says you are wrong"

[–] bdazman@hexbear.net 4 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

A ton of the most popular anarchist lit, which is right wing and of the objectivist school such as The Problem of Political Authority, isn't read by either socialists or left wing anarchists. I don't think it's neccesarily true that anarchist lit is unified enough to re-affirm a unified position. I do however think that anarchists hate reading longer works critiquing anarchism because many of them are written by people like Stalin, who as we all know killed every human being on earth multiple times and therefore his books on dialectical materialism and Socialism or Anarchism are ontologically invalid. That such criticisms of personal character also apply to their own authors is invalid because the only crime worse than causing harm is Possessing Power which, as is unfalsifiable, mutates the human spirit and corrupts in ways that make all existing revolutionary efforts that aren't anarchist invalid.

load more comments (36 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›