this post was submitted on 30 Dec 2025
221 points (91.4% liked)
Anarchism
2754 readers
46 users here now
Discuss anarchist praxis and philosophy. Don't take yourselves too seriously.
Other anarchist comms
- !anarchism@slrpnk.net
- !anarchism@lemmy.blahaj.zone
- !anarchism@hexbear.net
- !anarchism@lemmy.ml
- !anarchism101@lemmy.ca
- !flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Join the matrix room for some real-time discussion.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
None, if you're a principled anarchist. That's why I don't have a fundamental problem with anarchists (other than my philosophical objections to anarchism)
However, many self-proclaimed anarchists do in practice support imperialists because they have a big bone to grind with AES states or even anyone who positions themselves against western imperialism.
They internalise western propaganda against these states/nations, because I guess, it's a state so therefore it must be as comically evil as the worst fearmongering described by anglophone media. Or my favorite, "even only 10% of the atrocities were real, they would still be super evil", that kind of thinking.
Of course, I have some contact both with actual chinese or russian people (many of whom aren't even socialists), and they clearly have a much deeper and nuanced understanding of their nations than the even the most "I hate the government not the people" type of western anarchists. It makes the anarchists come off as silly white supremacists.
Most likely, if my contact with anarchists had begun with third world anarchists, I would never have had a phase of hating anarchists (which itself was a silly thing to do). But either way, I still find Marx more compelling than any anarchist writer, so I am still philosophically a Marxist.
I've never met or spoke online to an anarchist online who wasn't opposed to western imperialism. I've also never spoken to someone "with a bone to grind" with those against western imperialism unless they are rival imperialists in which case the "bone to grind" is with imperialism.
"Our glorious people's Ministry of Truth has determined that their wretched Mistry of Truth is lying while assuring us that OUR Ministry of Truth would never lie"
I don't know what you're trying to do here, encouraging racism instead of criticism of the state?
This is where the issue comes down to because many western leftists pretend, based on their own misunderstandings that many western rivals are imperialists, despite the fact that many of these western rivals have a net export of surplus labor/commodities, being exploited by international capital, therby having a class interest opposite of imperialism.
Not to mention the military encirclement that these nations face, which their enemy nationalists take as some sort of natural God-given equilibrium. Deviating from this encirclement by forceful measures is then taken as a sign of evil/imperialist ambition, meanwhile leftists at home in the west fail to resolve military encirclement by pressuring their governments. I mean, for how many decades has Cuba been under a blockade? What horrific conditions gaza has been subjected to. Can any of these situations be resolved without force? And if these people use force, they get called imperialists.
In the interests of fairness, the PRC during Mao and Deng's time also famously considered the USSR to be "social imperialists", helping cause the downfall of the USSR and setting back socialism by a century. So this isn't exclusively a western leftist problem.
My sibling in christ, do not insult my intelligence. The gaza genocide isn't even over. At least wait for the bodies to become cold before you start defending western media institutions.
It is a common deflection that I have seen. Furthermore, it is quite stupid as well, since governments don't fall from the heavens. They are made from the people. Modern states are not small warlord bands, but significant fractions of the entire populace and economy.