this post was submitted on 30 Dec 2025
27 points (90.9% liked)

Asklemmy

51840 readers
584 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In the languages of my ancestors, for example, if someone was 14 years old, they would be "14 รฅr gammal" in Swedish (14 years old) and "14 Jahre alt" in German (14 years old), but in Italian, they would say "ho 14 anni" (I have 14 years).

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Zagorath@aussie.zone 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

A few years ago, iirc, the Korean government instructed people to stop using the traditional system and to use the international system instead. Has that had much of an effect in practice, or are people largely ignoring it? Or do you think it's something that younger generations will pick up more over time while older people continue using the traditional system? (This last option being sort of what happened in Australia when we transitioned to metric through the '70s.)

Also, what happens to someone born on 1 January? Are they born du sal, and thus the youngest of their sal, or born han sal and remain han sal for a whole year?

[โ€“] terminal@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 day ago

Government docs use the international style for age, but in normal conversations people assume you are using traditional age unless otherwise specified.

[โ€“] Object@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Too socially prevalent. Most people know about this change, but they still use the old one. Anything official are now using the standard age, though.

Anyone born on Jan 1st stays one year old for the whole year since people gain age every time the year changes. This does mean that a person can be born on Dec 31st, and be two year old next day.

[โ€“] Zagorath@aussie.zone 4 points 1 day ago

I suppose then, for any child born around 00:10 on 1 January, there might be some pressure to encourage the doctor to write the birth certificate as something more like 23:50 on 31 December? Because of the social prestige with being older?

Or maybe the opposite, since being physically older than your peers is correlated with better academic and sporting performance?