this post was submitted on 29 Dec 2025
540 points (98.9% liked)

Not The Onion

19088 readers
759 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] damnedfurry@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

For there to be squatters, the landlords had to have this property open and unrented for a while.

Huh? A squatter is most commonly simply a former renter who stops paying without moving out. The property is not vacant at any point.

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

You're describing holdover tenants. Those are not the same as squatters. Holdover tenants have more rights in California.

Edit: worded that wrong.