this post was submitted on 29 Dec 2025
334 points (99.7% liked)

Not The Onion

19076 readers
1007 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SteelEmpire@anarchist.nexus 4 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

So as long as the bourgeoise exist, there will always be a problem?

Sounds like the only solution is to collectively agree to delete the bourgeoise.

[–] muntedcrocodile@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

OK Marx sure. So what do u replace it with? Someone has to "own" ie control all the things and if u just hand it all over to some entity "the state" you have just reinvented aristocracy.

[–] SteelEmpire@anarchist.nexus 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Someone has to “own” ie control all the things

That's an extremely silly statement. Do you really believe in a single global landlord that owns everything that everyone else must pay rent to? If one person owns everything like you say, you just destroyed private ownership.

You managed to accuse me of being both Marx and a monarchist all while you call to end any private ownership in just one post.

[–] muntedcrocodile@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

That is possibly the worst faith interpretation of my statement. Everything is owned by someone not necessarily the same someone. For instance I own and am thus responsible for my property, someone else is responsible for their property hence everything is owned by someone.

What's the functional difference between communism and a monarchy? In both cased all property is owned by "the state" and can exercise control over that property however they please. Democracy doesn't work cos the people have no control of any property and thus are completely beholden to the state. Good luck protesting against the government when you have no food, water, means to communicate, and travel. What are u gonna do about the inevitable authoritarian takeover? Die?

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 hours ago

actually, ownership is a human invention and it is not necessary at all.