this post was submitted on 29 Dec 2025
439 points (99.3% liked)

Not The Onion

19076 readers
918 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SteelEmpire@anarchist.nexus 3 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Someone has to “own” ie control all the things

That's an extremely silly statement. Do you really believe in a single global landlord that owns everything that everyone else must pay rent to? If one person owns everything like you say, you just destroyed private ownership.

You managed to accuse me of being both Marx and a monarchist all while you call to end any private ownership in just one post.

[–] muntedcrocodile@lemmy.world 0 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

That is possibly the worst faith interpretation of my statement. Everything is owned by someone not necessarily the same someone. For instance I own and am thus responsible for my property, someone else is responsible for their property hence everything is owned by someone.

What's the functional difference between communism and a monarchy? In both cased all property is owned by "the state" and can exercise control over that property however they please. Democracy doesn't work cos the people have no control of any property and thus are completely beholden to the state. Good luck protesting against the government when you have no food, water, means to communicate, and travel. What are u gonna do about the inevitable authoritarian takeover? Die?

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

actually, ownership is a human invention and it is not necessary at all.

[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

No it's not. Even animals fight over territory and property. There are cases of them sharing, yes, but they're not the absolute norm.

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 hours ago

animals don't own anything. there is nothing an animal can have that you can't rightfully take from them.

[–] muntedcrocodile@lemmy.world 0 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Ownership is simply the word we use to describe the person who ultimately controls and is thus responsible for any particularly thing. Please describe a system in ownership isn't a thing. The only one I can think of is anarchy until someone finds a gun and announces that everything now belongs to them and that their is nothing u can do about it

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 hours ago

anarchy until someone finds a gun and announces that everything now belongs to them and that their is nothing u can do about it

it is anarchy. your gunman is a despot, and is not part of anarchism.