this post was submitted on 28 Dec 2025
46 points (65.3% liked)

vegan

3572 readers
159 users here now

Please also check out Lemmy.vg for a great set of well-run communities for vegan news, science, cooking, circlejerking. It is a nice, cozy, all-in-one space for vegans.


We ask that the you have an understanding on what veganism is before engaging in this community.

If you think you have been banned erroneously, please get in contact with one of the other mods for appeals.

Moderator reports may not federate properly and may delay moderator action. Please DM an active mod if an abusive comment remains after reporting it.


Welcome

Welcome to c/vegan@lemmy.world. Broadly, this community is a place to discuss veganism. Discussion on intersectional topics related to the animal rights movement are also encouraged.

What is Veganism?

'Veganism is a philosophy and way of living which seeks to exclude—as far as is possible and practicable—all forms of exploitation of, and cruelty to, animals ...'

— abridged definition from The Vegan Society

Rules

The rules are subject to change, especially upon community feedback.

  1. Discrimination is not tolerated. This includes speciesism.
  2. Topics not relating to veganism are subject to removal.
  3. Posts are to be as accessible as practicable:
    • embedded images of text require alt-text
    • posts with an image of text should have a transcription in the body or alt-text
    • paywalled articles must have an accessible non-paywalled link;
    • use the original source whenever possible for a news article.
  4. Content warnings are required for triggering content.
  5. Bad-faith carnist rhetoric & anti-veganism are not allowed, as this is not a space to debate the merits of veganism. Anyone is welcome here, however, and so good-faith efforts to ask questions about veganism may be given their own weekly stickied post in the future.
    • before jumping into the community, we encourage you to read examples of common fallacies here.
    • if you're asking questions about veganism, be mindful that the person on the other end is trying to be helpful by answering you and treat them with at least as much respect as they give you.
  6. Posts and comments whose contents – text, images, etc. – are largely created by a generative AI model are subject to removal. We want you to be a part of the vegan community, not a multi-head attention layer running on a server farm.
  7. Posts linking to Twitter/X or any similar site will be removed.
  8. No brigading, either off-site or on-site. An incitement to brigade includes two elements: a call to disruptive action and a specific direction outside of this community in which to take that action. Exceptions include:
    • Calls to boycott.
    • Calls to in-person protest of a government, high-profile individual, or company/organization.
    • Votes provided they have a sufficiently broad target audience or provably effective controls against vote brigading.
    • Petitions.
  9. All Lemmy.World Terms of Service also apply.

Resources on Veganism

A compilation of many vegan resources/sites in a Google spreadsheet:

Here are some documentaries that are recommended to watch if planning to or have recently become vegan:

Vegan Matrix Instance:

Vegan Dating App Veggly

Iphone

Android

Vegan Fediverse

Lemmy:

lemmy.vg

vegantheoryclub.org

Mastodon:

veganism.social

Other Vegan Communities

General Vegan Comms

!vegan@lemmy.vg

!vegan@vegantheoryclub.org

!vegan@slrpnk.net

Circlejerk Comms

!vegancirclejerk@lemmy.vg

!vegancirclejerk@lemmy.world

Vegan Food / Cooking

!veganfood@lemmy.vg

!homecooks@vegantheoryclub.org

!veganrecipes@sh.itjust.works

!recipes@vegantheoryclub.org

Debate a Vegan

!debate_a_vegan@lemmy.world

Vegan Food Scanner

!openfoodfacts@lemmy.ca

Attribution

Twitter

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I think some concessions could be made for small batch local milk and eggs.

[–] LordCrom@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I was gonna say, i have chickens and get my own eggs. They are treated well. Even after their egg laying time is up, then they become basically pets.

I mean if you are vegan to avoid cruelty to animals, then raise your own chickens.....its really super easy. And the eggs taste better too.

[–] lalo@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

If I help some mentally handicapped homeless women with newborn children, do you think it's OK for me to milk these women since I'm helping them? Even if their milk taste the freshest?

Veganism is about not exploiting animals when you don't have to.

Even in your scenario, there can be cruelty involved: the hatcheries you get your chickens from also grind the day old male baby chicks. These genetically modified egg laying hens that put about 1 egg a day have a huge strain on their bodies compared to what their natural counterpart used to be (red jungle fowl), laying about 1 egg a month.

But to reiterate, veganism is about not exploiting animals.

[–] neatchee@piefed.social 6 points 3 days ago (2 children)

My concern is that many vegans who are deeply concerned about the exploitation of animals are ignoring the exploitation of people at the same time which feels deeply hypocritical, if not performative.

If you're refusing to raise chickens because you feel it's exploitative, but you are happily buying bulk produce from a chain grocery store in the USA, you are contributing directly to the exploitation of migrant workers.

I would rather exploit a chicken than a human. If I can raise a chicken easily but not grow the equivalent source of protein myself (soy etc) and would have to rely on the grocery chain or post exorbitant prices at local farmers markets, I'm sorry, but I'm going to raise the chicken for eggs.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I'm vegan specifically because the flesh trade involves exploitation of human workers. Killing those day old male baby chicks has a psychological toll on the humans that are forced to do it for their paycheck.

[–] lalo@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

One thing is a system that depends on exploitation. These systems should be abolished, like exploiting animals for their flesh or secretions.

Another completely different thing is a system that contains exploitation. These should be improved, like underpaid/overworked employees.

There is no hypocrisy in that. It's not a dichotomy where you need to exploit either an animal or an human. Just go vegan and also advocate for human rights.

[–] neatchee@piefed.social 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

As a consumer, I do not have a choice. I am presented with a reality right now: contribute to the exploitation of a human, or contribute to the exploitation of an animal.

The theory you are presenting is lovely but it does not reflect the experience I am actually living. I do not consider it morally acceptable to contribute to the exploitation of humans but not animals, simply because getting vegetables without exploiting migrants is something we could theoretically do one day.

Can you imagine sitting in front of a migrant and telling them "yeah, I mean, I know they're treating you like shit, and I could help with that by not giving them money until they treat you better, but to do that I'd have to take eggs from a chicken, so I'm gonna give your oppressors my money and just be angry about it, okay?"

That just feels really wrong.

For the record, it's problems like this that make me a moral relativist. For some people it is ethical to eat eggs. For others it is not. The calculus is complicated and I cannot get behind the idea of an absolute right or wrong.

[–] v4ld1z@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 days ago (2 children)

so you eat eggs and meat and cheese exclusively to not exploit migrants farming the vegetables you eat?

what about going vegan and buying organic vegetables if you're so concerned about human labor being exploited? I know I can't afford it, but the least I can do I be vegan and abstain from unjustified and unnecessary animal cruelty, no?

[–] lalo@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 3 days ago

Everybody knows that animal feed comes from magical farms that never exploit humans.

Come on you vegan dummy, go get your B12 supplement. >!/s!<

So funny how when 'vegan' is mentioned, everybody is a homesteader.

[–] neatchee@piefed.social 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

This conversation was spawned from a question about home-raised livestock. My reply is specifically in that context. I would rather raise a chicken for it's eggs and treat it as well as possible than put those same resources in the hands of exploitative grocers and produce providers.

It is far more feasible for an individual to raise one or two chickens for eggs than it is for them to farm the equivalent protein from vegan food sources.

As I originally said, my concern is with people who do not consider the downstream consequences of their decisions thoroughly and ignore or disregard the ways in which they contribute to human suffering while placing a high priority on animal suffering.

We all have limited options. Of course we should do what we can to eliminate suffering and exploitation in every way possible, both for humans and animals. But I have seen friends who went vegan gleefully buying soy products from Walmart even after being shown the option of raising a chicken at home and claiming a moral victory.

It bugs me 🤷‍♀️

[–] PetteriSkaffari@lemmy.world -1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It is not necessary to eat eggs, so why bother keeping chicken captive and occupying nature with providing their food? When vegetable nutrients are consumed directly, you'll need less area to grow them.

[–] neatchee@piefed.social 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I've answered this multiple times already. I'm not going to write it out again. Feel free to read my other comments.

[–] PetteriSkaffari@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago

I did not see the above argument before, please feel free to store it in your vegan arguments list somewhere. Besides, it was more like a rhetorical question anyway.

[–] lalo@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

You say that as if migrant workers aren't exploited to make animal products.

When you buy a meal, you have 2 options: contribute to animal exploitation (that probably contains human exploitation) or not.

If you know which companies exploit humans, it's on you to denounce them publicly and not support them.

Until you can name these companies so you know what to avoid, you can be sure that any animal product you get is the result of animal exploitation (and probably human as well).

[–] neatchee@piefed.social 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

We were specifically discussing the consumption of eggs from home-raised livestock so I'm not sure this reply is in context?

[–] lalo@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Why not compare to home crops, then? If the person has resources to produce the animal feed (so they can ensure there are no humans being exploited, right?), they surely can grow crops to directly eat.

[–] neatchee@piefed.social 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Crops take dramatically more land, and labor, for one.

And it is absolutely feasible and not especially difficult to feed one or two chickens with responsibly sourced animal feed options at a reasonable price, compared to the cost and availability of responsibly sourced vegan protein.

(Chicken feed from a local farmer is drastically cheaper than human-consumable produce from the same source.. Half the time you are literally just getting the leftovers from what they use for their own livestock)

It feels like you're trying to move the goal posts on me.

[–] lalo@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Until now you were arguing that buying plants would incur in human exploitation. But now that I've argued for the least exploitative scenario, you came up with 'responsibly sourced plant options at a reasonable price'.

So now we can get plants without exploiting immigrants, right?

Then there's no need to exploit animals, simple as that

[–] neatchee@piefed.social 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

No. Please go reread the conversation again. I have always been discussing the relatively high cost of responsibly sourced vegan protein compared to raising one or two chickens for their eggs, which drives people who want to be vegan to purchase cheaper produce that involves exploiting humans. That has always been my concern. And that has always been what I've focused on. And saying that it is relatively easy to responsibly source chicken feed at a reasonable price compared to doing the same for human-consumable protein is perfectly consistent with my entire argument

~~You have just made an absolute statement of ideology that is disregarding rational debate. That is exactly what I have a problem with. You have decided on a specific ideology and nothing will change your mind, even when presented with reasonable explanations of why it may be flawed for some people.~~ You appear to have edited your comment to add a "then" before the last sentence, or I misread.

I'm done with this conversation now. Thank you for remaining civil, at least. Have a great day/night.

[–] lalo@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I'll just summarize your points:

  • There's a way to get cheap and ethically sourced plants when they're destined for animals
  • There's no way to get cheap and ethically sourced plants when they're destined for humans

You're missing that humans are also animals and we eat some of the same crops non-human animals eat. The human exploitation you're arguing against doesn't magically disappear from crops grown for animals.

[–] neatchee@piefed.social 2 points 3 days ago

Yup. You've got my points exactly correct. And when you're ready to live on chicken feed every day we can continue this discussion. Until then, I will respectfully disagree with your claim.