this post was submitted on 24 Dec 2025
442 points (93.7% liked)

Technology

78015 readers
3485 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tired_n_bored@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

I don't like the fact that it has two displays. It's unnecessary and makes it thicker and heavier.

[–] natecox@programming.dev 1 points 1 day ago

It’s too bad this isn’t actually “DIY”, because I have been mulling over building a dual screen e-ink sheet music reader for a while. Dual screens definitely have a place, it’s just niche.

I like the concept. I have a e-ink reader where I removed the hull because it's annoying, but at some point I must have damaged the display a bit and now it has a little black spot. With this the added bulk also doubles the area available for text. Maybe not that useful for novels that you read through linearly, but for non-fiction it would be nice to see other chapters, glossaries, etc. on one display while keeping the other at the page you were reading. Mainly a problem of software and enough buttons to be able to comfortably use that.

Though the low-res displays of this prototype look atrocious to me (pixelation and uneven blackness), maybe a later version will improve on that.

[–] winkerjadams@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 days ago (3 children)

How else would it recreate a book unless it had a folding display which would be even worse?

[–] tired_n_bored@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

Books are made like this because it's impossible to make them any other way, but a digital device can have just one "page" since you read one page at time like Kindles and Kobos

[–] bluGill@fedia.io 4 points 2 days ago

The other option is a scroll. historicaly I'm told a book was always a scroll and the factor we now call a book was a codex. (I don't know how to verify this)

[–] nyan@lemmy.cafe 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

For some people, recreating the form factor of a book is the point, regardless of its convenience or cost. I'm sure whoever put this thing together was quite aware of how mainstream e-readers are built and didn't want that, or they would have bought a Kindle or a Kobo.

[–] Zink@programming.dev 2 points 2 days ago

I can imagine a future device with an e-ink page that's so thin and flexible that it looks and feels like a paper book with magic changing text. I don't know how many consumers would pay a premium for that, but I would definitely buy my wife one.

[–] Simulation6@sopuli.xyz 7 points 3 days ago

Go old school and have it recreate a scroll. Really, not having to shift your head/eyes when reading is a plus with r-readers.

[–] yggstyle@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Nevermind the fact most readers and tablets come -with- a cover ... So its almost like a book anyway. Which people fold behind the page. Like a book. What was that extra screen doing again?

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

a cover ... Which people fold behind the page. Like a book.

Ho ho hold the fuck up

[–] yggstyle@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago