this post was submitted on 21 Dec 2025
96 points (96.2% liked)
technology
24139 readers
259 users here now
On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.
Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020
- Ways to run Microsoft/Adobe and more on Linux
- The Ultimate FOSS Guide For Android
- Great libre software on Windows
- Hey you, the lib still using Chrome. Read this post!
Rules:
- 1. Obviously abide by the sitewide code of conduct. Bigotry will be met with an immediate ban
- 2. This community is about technology. Offtopic is permitted as long as it is kept in the comment sections
- 3. Although this is not /c/libre, FOSS related posting is tolerated, and even welcome in the case of effort posts
- 4. We believe technology should be liberating. As such, avoid promoting proprietary and/or bourgeois technology
- 5. Explanatory posts to correct the potential mistakes a comrade made in a post of their own are allowed, as long as they remain respectful
- 6. No crypto (Bitcoin, NFT, etc.) speculation, unless it is purely informative and not too cringe
- 7. Absolutely no tech bro shit. If you have a good opinion of Silicon Valley billionaires please manifest yourself so we can ban you.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Run deepseek/qwen locally or something. It's still useful. Never use AI as a service though.
By running AI locally you're avoiding the "easy" issues with AI: privacy and control. Sure.
But you're still falling victim to brain atrophy by a language prediction model pretending to be able to reason, you're frying your ability to decipher and organize complex information by yourself in exchange for an average-blob of collective internet answers.
This second part is significantly more damaging than the first, and we are just at the start. Don't engage with the slop, wether it runs on your computer locally, your phone, or wherever else.
it really depends on exactly how you engage with AI. using it doesn't magically make you stupid, it just makes it easier to be lazy in certain ways. I think LLMs are interesting for search (even though we absolutely still need normal boolean search because language models are lossy). They seem like they're good at synthesizing information, but that seems like an illusion to me. You gotta establish boundaries because the hype (and our cultural notions about AI) don't give us healthy or realistic ones by default.
As an example, I'm not a programmer. Not interested in being one. I set up Radarr on my home server this week and it wants all video files in their own named folders to import. I had like 400 movies I needed to manually make a folder for so Radarr can detect it. I asked AI to make me a script that just read the name of the movie, made a folder with the same name, then moved the movie into it. Took all of 3 minutes for a task I will never do again.
I don't outsource my brain to AI. It's mostly just to get fringe information regarding development. It's more like using a search engine.
Then why not use a search engine? You'll find the answer is "it requires more work" which just means it requires engaging in filtering information.
You're already outsourcing your brain to AI.
It's not "more work" it's "more time". The alternative to a lot of cases isn't "well I'll carefully handcraft a solution like an 18th century artisan" it's "no time to do this, goes on the backlog I'll never get around to"
So you're frequently dealing with problems that require searching for information and they're important enough that you need to do it quickly, yet they're not important enough to warrant attention and you'd rather risk having a slop machine that gets 4 out of 6 answers wrong in hard to notice ways.
Sounds... Important, I guess.
^this