Chapotraphouse

14213 readers

536 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

LENINSGHOSTFACEKILLA@hexbear.net

corgiwithalaptop@hexbear.net

a_little_red_rat@hexbear.net

khizuo@hexbear.net

thelastaxolotl@hexbear.net

CoolerOpposide@hexbear.net

How many more "socialists" do you guys need to elect before it stops being a struggle session every damned time (hexbear.net)

submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by Andrzej3K@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net

94 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Do you know how often bourgeois democracies elect "socialists"? Hell, many of them even elect "communists" on the regular. It's normal. Get over it. Please.

EDIT - there are basically two main genres of Mamdani poster, both of which keep scrawling MAMDANI on the wall in their own excrement for different reasons, and they all seem to be assuming I am from the other side lol

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] SickSemper@hexbear.net 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

https://hexbear.net/post/5899168

267 upvotes and was pinned to the front page. The average democrat doesn’t get that treatment here. I see that it’s older than your account but that may be the disconnect

Again with the communism strawman. It’s people claiming the label socialist before warping it to mean nice progressive democrat. We push back on people like the American communist party who appropriate leftist language for nationalist goals, why would we permit Bernie, AOC, Mamdani to do the same with actual power and offices?