this post was submitted on 18 Dec 2025
131 points (94.6% liked)

Global News

5448 readers
253 users here now

What is global news?

Something that happened or was uncovered recently anywhere in the world. It doesn't have to have global implications. Just has to be informative in some way.


Post guidelines

Title formatPost title should mirror the news source title.
URL formatPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.
Country prefixCountry prefix can be added to the title with a separator (|, :, etc.) where title is not clear enough from which country the news is coming from.


Rules

This community is moderated in accordance with the principles outlined in Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which emphasizes the right to freedom of opinion and expression. In addition to this foundational principle, we have some additional rules to ensure a respectful and constructive environment for all users.

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. No social media postsAvoid all social media posts. Try searching for a source that has a written article or transcription on the subject.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

Icon generated via LLM model | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

By the end of 2025, Russia’s total irrecoverable losses in the war are projected to reach 1.2 million—a figure unseen since World War II. Yet in the Kremlin, these unprecedented casualties are met with calm resolve. Russia appears willing to continue the war, losing hundreds of thousands of soldiers each year.

Archived version: https://archive.is/20251218190019/https://united24media.com/war-in-ukraine/russia-has-lost-12-million-troops-in-ukraine-more-than-its-entire-pre-war-army-14361


Disclaimer: The article linked is from a single source with a single perspective. Make sure to cross-check information against multiple sources to get a comprehensive view on the situation.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BrikoX@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (4 children)

More like 35 years until they have 0 military age males left if the current pace of losses continues. This also doesn't factor in people that fled the country after the conscriptions were announced.

14/0.4 = 35

According to the UN’s World Population Prospects report from 2019, there were a projected 14.25 million men aged 20-34 in Russia in 2020.

https://www.russiamatters.org/analysis/russian-military-facing-looming-demography-crisis

[–] TankieTanuki@hexbear.net 10 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Sadly^[I mean that earnestly. Having an entire generation hollowed out of a country is tragic in any context.], it's just ~1-2 years for Ukraine.

[–] BrikoX@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Both countries are in the same position demographically. Their pyramids looks almost identical.

[–] FortifiedAttack@hexbear.net 8 points 2 weeks ago

Key difference is a factor of 4.

[–] TankieTanuki@hexbear.net 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Do these graphs cite a source? I can't make any out, but maybe it's a text color thing.

The chart I shared is from the NYT, which is not known for a pro-Russian bias.

[–] BrikoX@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] TankieTanuki@hexbear.net 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Okay, I've had time to parse things a little.

Interestingly, the NYT chart and the pyramids website use the same data source! I didn't expect that because the charts look different to me, but maybe that's just because the NYT chart has more granularity.

It looks like you're right that the two countries share the same same demographic "shape". The culprit is Gorbachev and the catastrophic dissolution of the USSR which caused birthrates to plummet in all former Soviet states, so it makes sense that they would suffer similar fates.

It also looks like the war did, in fact, worsen the problem for Ukraine, which had a ~50% drop among fighting-aged men (which is coincidentally also the "nadir" cohort) from 2021 to 2023 😦. Somehow they gained some people in 2024. I don't understand how that's possible TBH—it's not like the war has got better in that time. Have there been a lot of repatriations? [Edit: Yes.]

NYT charts for 2021, 2023, and 2024

We would need it to compare it to the changes in Russia's population over the same period to have the full picture. I'm going to go get dinner so maybe another comrade can help me out. I would expect a similar dynamic, but less pronounced due to the 4x population difference.

[–] BrikoX@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I only skimmed the report, but there is research on this.

Also, it will probably spike again if US goes through their plan to deport Ukrainian refugees.

[–] TankieTanuki@hexbear.net 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Good find; thanks! So it is repatriations.

I hope the US doesn't do that, because forcing people into a war zone against their will would be even more cruel than the typical deportations already are.

One line in the intro caught my eye:

Russia started the large-scale military invasion

It made me laugh, because the author obviously started with the FULL-SCALE INVASION line that the Anglo media has been uniformly blasting for years, but—because academic work is less propagandistic than the news—they paused to give it some thought and correctly realized that there is no way to know or define what a truly "full-scale" conflict is, so they removed the absolute language.

[–] TankieTanuki@hexbear.net 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Thanks. We'll need to dig to figure out what's going on

[–] Hux@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 weeks ago

I am optimistic that a forward-thinking Russia of the future won’t deny 6 year old girls or 90 year old women the egalitarian opportunity to “defend the motherland”.

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 weeks ago

More like 35 years until they have 0 military age males left

Nah, the thing with "military age" is that you can write down a new set of numbers.

[–] Decq@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

Like Russia cares what age you are. As long as you can buffer a few bullets, you're good to go!